The Difference? The Photos

As I largely stepped away to focus more on photography about a year ago, I have gotten more clarity. Looking through Tryst ads for the first time in months, there is generally a differentiation between pricing. The main difference is the photography in their ad. There seems to be a definitive line. Those with obviously professional photos, are often brining in higher rates. It’s not just the model’s good looks. Some beautiful ladies with amateur photos that don’t do them justice.

I have shot for several providers on Tryst. One recently told me her bookings skyrocketed after our photos.

I'm certainly in need of some quality photography. We should chat darling.

I'm certainly in need of some quality photography. We should chat darling. Originally Posted by TS_Audacia

Feel free to DM. I have really reasonable rates.

Yes photos are a key issue for any provider.
And there are several photogs here as members, including a gal in Texas.
I specifically want to note that photos from a handheld communicator simply fail when contrasted to a pro camera pic.

My K-Girl ATF (trying to brand and market herself) ... went all in!
She paid a top photog $1200 for a 3-hour photo shoot!
With a makeup artist and wardrobe consultant.
The top photog came up with an elaborate (totally hot) photo spread and an enticing, CFM, teaser video!
Her business took off!
She became an item!
She became fully booked!
(She was bankin' 1/4 mil a year!)

I'm certainly in need of some quality photography. We should chat darling. Originally Posted by TS_Audacia

Soon shooting with you. Thank you for your nice comments and for gracing me with your beauty.