Provider that wants more now for dumping her.

She blackmails you, so you post here saying you are thinking about going to the cops. Is this your way of trying to scare her into leaving you alone. I think this post was more for her to see to make her think you are going to out her out to everyone.. If you're not going to say who it is then you should have never posted to begin with. 3 pages later no info has been given out and Im sure there is alot more to the story..
Hate to say it but even if you do out her there will still be some guys who will see her. this post will hurt you more because what female is going to want to see you if you are willing to call the cops. There are other ways to handle this IMO

I hate seeing posts by guys who will bitch and moan about what a lady has done to them, but refuse to give out her name. Why make the post then?

If she's doing this to you, she'll do it with another guy in the future. Why you aren't giving the board her name is beyond me. This board is to help everyone in the hobby and especially to keep others safe.

Don't you want to potentially save another guy from going through this? Originally Posted by MsElena

I agree 100% You wanted to know what recourse you have, letting all of us know her name is the only recourse you have.

Look, he was NEVER going to LE (How stupid would that be?) and he was probably never going to give out her name here. The purpose of the thread wasn't to give us more information or help anyone other than himself. The sole purpose could only have been to warn her to back off or he would 'out' her conduct here. He probably could have done the same thing with a PM to her (perhaps he did) but chose to make a thread just to get the point across. Just my 2 cents.

Look, he was NEVER going to LE (How stupid would that be?) and he was probably never going to give out her name here. The purpose of the thread wasn't to give us more information or help anyone other than himself. The sole purpose could only have been to warn her to back off or he would 'out' her conduct here. He probably could have done the same thing with a PM to her (perhaps he did) but chose to make a thread just to get the point across. Just my 2 cents. Originally Posted by KCSmutMonkey

Excellent comment, IMHO. Sums it all up. He's not saying anything, so close it and move on. He's done what he wanted to do.

Look, he was NEVER going to LE (How stupid would that be?) and he was probably never going to give out her name here. The purpose of the thread wasn't to give us more information or help anyone other than himself. The sole purpose could only have been to warn her to back off or he would 'out' her conduct here. He probably could have done the same thing with a PM to her (perhaps he did) but chose to make a thread just to get the point across. Just my 2 cents. Originally Posted by KCSmutMonkey

Winner, winner, chicken dinner. Elena and Stacy both had excellent points, but the fact remains that this thread is in its own way, a reverse form of blackmail.

A lot of ladies will cross the OP off their lists.

Kisses,

- Jackie

Let's be fair, Queen said that before KCSmutMonkey did! (and I agree with both of them)

The OP said the provider was UTR, so she may not even be a member of this board or even know about this board (which is probably an incorrect assumption since the OP said she was well-reviewed). I would deduce that it is probably one of the seven or eight providers that he has reviewed - so he probably is doing more harm to those providers he has reviewed because, if you analyze this to its logical conclusion, hobbyists will avoid the providers he has reviewed on the off-chance that one of them is the provider in question - guilt by association.

Therefore, unless he reveals the name of the provider in question, he may be harming the business of seven or eight providers just to protect the one who is guilty.

I scrolled up and read Queen's post... I'm getting to be a lazy poster lately and just reading the previous post or two. Thanks for pointing that out, KCQ. And...

Excellent comment, Queen! And where the hell you been hiding all summer??

The OP said the provider was UTR, so she may not even be a member of this board or even know about this board (which is probably an incorrect assumption since the OP said she was well-reviewed). I would deduce that it is probably one of the seven or eight providers that he has reviewed - so he probably is doing more harm to those providers he has reviewed because, if you analyze this to its logical conclusion, hobbyists will avoid the providers he has reviewed on the off-chance that one of them is the provider in question - guilt by association.

Therefore, unless he reveals the name of the provider in question, he may be harming the business of seven or eight providers just to protect the one who is guilty. Originally Posted by fritz3552

Its none of the ladies I have reviewed. Thru the back channel I'm hearing I'm not the only one that has had issues with her, be it maybe not as severe. Close the thread if you want. Got all the input I need for now. Thanks for all your help.

As the OP has requested this thread be closed, and he has received well-intentioned input from several members on both sides of the issue, I am closing this thread. Thank you for the input - this was one of the best threads where a myriad of opinions was stated in a short period of time without going off-topic or making personal attacks and arguments between members.