Good question for a lawyer. I’d feel better if some sexual activity or nudity on her part occurred before any money changed hands. Originally Posted by TinManHmm wonder if word got out to the sub amps.
Unfortunately just the "charge" is enough to ruin most people. You might fight it an win but did you really win? Originally Posted by bjonx69
This law also makes it possible for a lady to later accuse you of paying her. She can make a police report as easy as women so inclined report sex harrassment. The police can now put out a warrant for your arrest just on a woman's word. Originally Posted by BuckwiserPolice don't put out warrants, courts do. And in this example, I doubt it would take long to discover a spurious claim was made. Remember, false accusations taken before a Judge is criminal action itself.
Police don't put out warrants, courts do. And in this example, I doubt it would take long to discover a spurious claim was made. Remember, false accusations taken before a Judge is criminal action itself.That is true about warrants. But, I will tell you from seeing a friend go through a situation, even tho there was no warrant issued due to lack of evidence, the guy still suffers. Any woman that accuses a man a of rape, physical/mental abuse, ect. is automatically believed by LE. He is not only arrested, but subsequently loses his job, has thousands of dollars in legal fees to pay and is estranged from former friends and family many times. Then, after all that, they find out she was a jilted lover or just a woman with a grudge. No charges against her either.
The new law is over-reaching and obssessively punitive. But let's keep it in context, and away from hyperbole. Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I read the law over the weekend. The confidential claimant language is aimed at pimps and managers, not johns. Originally Posted by TinManExactly,
This last paragraph is not too far off of what I came away with after I read the entire bill. What one has to remember is LE does get tools they will use to press johns into helping their case if they are able. The guys here need to look long and hard at how they hobby (and what they share about their activities on SHMBs) in order to mitigate that risk.
That new law is suppose to focus on pimps mainly, not johns, but LE has been trying to take down pimps for a long time ( I hope this time it works, as I would love to see a few pimps I know behind bars so they can be the bitch). In other words, they are saying that although prostitution is illegal itself, it is not as bad as long as the hooker is willing and not forced. Originally Posted by Wile E Coyote
The bill was written by a democrat. "HB 1540 was filed by state Rep. Senfronia Thompson (D-Houston)". Originally Posted by Iaintliein
So I see this bill as a part of a trend in this continuing war to destroy men... Originally Posted by BuckwiserWow, just wow.
What one has to remember is LE does get tools they will use to press johns into helping their case if they are able. Originally Posted by TinManThis right here. They're going to bank on the idea that anyone caught up in a case like this is going to want it to go away rather than going to trial where they are likely to be acquitted. It's unlikely they'll have any admissible evidence they can use, but the risk of having things out in the public record is enough to get most people to get to a plea on lesser, and lesser embarrassing charges.