What do you base your provider judgements on?

I prefer hooks who do not attempt to love con, who are able to get into their own car and drive to where I happen to be rather than making me come to them, who do not try to pressure me into giving them money that they did not earn because they are experiencing personal crises, and who make my arrow point straight up immediately. Willingness to send dirty pictures is good too.

Thanks for all of the great responses!

A sprinckle of cuntiness never hurts....

Thanks for all of the great responses! Originally Posted by bustybabygirl

jimmie market research eh

...hope it puts more ...meat ...on yer table

how they act at a bar, M&G or party

The emphasis on "behavior" surprises me.

There are a couple of things that could be described as behaviors that are disqualifiers for me - throwing up, acting like ghetto trash in my immediate presence, pretending to ignore me, outright rudeness, arrogance - that kind of shit. Otherwise I could care less how a hook behaves, unless it's an overnight.

I like dumb hooks. I like naïve hayseeds. I like hookers who look more like regular females than made-up French poodles who just got back from a grooming session at the veterinarian.

Mostly I like hookers who make my needle move?

I don't know. This is a good topic to distract me from actual substantive problems though.

For the most part attitude trumps everything else. I much prefer good GFE's. They have enthusiasm and give you a sense they enjoy what's happening. Can't get into those detached sessions. A gal who's mechanical and just goes through the motions bores me regardless of how hot she may be. I'll take an average looking gal who's a good GFE over a young hottie who doesn't give a shit any day. CBJ's are generally a deal breaker. Just can't get into them. Nothing kills the mood faster than a gal wanting to cover you up as soon as your clothes hit the floor. You're probably in for a rush session when that happens.

I won't pay 300 because you look great, but will if you fuck great. Originally Posted by generalbob

I would agree. Eye candy only goes so far. At higher donations you're looking for a really good experience, not just something to look at.

Maybe my problem is that my dick doesn't want any part of average or below-average looking hooks. Is that really a problem though?

I like females with good attitudes. I especially like supervising them in work environments or talking to them about things that have absolutely nothing to do with me fucking them. It helps me blow off steam.

I guess I see hook hunting as strictly a sexual thing as opposed to a social exercise?

The emphasis on "behavior" surprises me.

Th. Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

I agree. Looks are the most important. If I am not attracted to a provider then there is no way the session will be good. There are other things that are important but that is the most,

I will take a young hottie just going through the motions any day over someone I don't find attractive no matter what they do. And please don't play soft music and put on an act like what we have is some big romantic date. I hate that. I am not looking for someone to put on an act like she is my girlfriend ( I find that pathetic ) I am looking for a sex worker.

I like hookers who look more like regular females than made-up French poodles who just got back from a grooming session at the veterinarian. Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

You say this about liking regular looking hookers which means average....

Then you say the following...

Maybe my problem is that my dick doesn't want any part of average or below-average looking hooks. Is that really a problem though? Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

Which is it?

It's what it says it is.

Women who don't deliberately go out of their way to look like over-the-top hookers are not automatically "average". At least not to me they're not.

There's more to being sexually attractive than looking like a whore.

Wholesome women are attractive to me. I understand 100% that this is not universal.

And by being wholesome, a female is not necessarily attractive. It's like a component.

I agree. Looks are the most important. If I am not attracted to a provider then there is no way the session will be good. There are other things that are important but that is the most,

I will take a young hottie just going through the motions any day over someone I don't find attractive no matter what they do. And please don't play soft music and put on an act like what we have is some big romantic date. I hate that. I am not looking for someone to put on an act like she is my girlfriend ( I find that pathetic ) I am looking for a sex worker. Originally Posted by brianjackson

Exactly.

Physical attraction is the most basic and essential element of any of this shit, unless you're looking for a new best friend, in which case I recommend a dog. Or if a dog is too expensive, a goldfish. Or adopt a rescue dog. Or a cat.

If it weren't for eccie I would be completely unaware that horrible looking hooks even existed, other than on television or in 70's pornography.

Overweight hookers?

Blasphemy.

.

I like a provider that makes me feel comfortable and desirable, without making it seem phoney. Looks are important, but attitude is what keeps you coming back. GFE, is a really what I crave from a Provider, anything less, and it just seems like sex and bad acting. There are some great providers in upstate NY, and there are some average ones to.
A provider with good looks and a great body will always get a first date, a provider with a good attitude and great personality will get multiple dates and good reviews....."as long as she is also easy on the eyes".....