...I agree with this. When I was reading the transcript of his speech, the one posted on Brietbart (sp?), he mentioned different topics being discussed in gay bars.
and in private company, say at some cocktail party, some might hear people like that talk and see such random statements as provoking and interesting. said in public, or with the aid of an exposing phone camera used surreptitiously in a private setting , enemies will pounce Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
The stuff that we speak of on Eccie, or topics that are jokingly discussed in bars, aren't really fit to be spoken of publicly, or on the news.
I pretty much agree with what some have posted above. He was trying to be shocking, liked the attention that he was getting, and just went too far.
I don't believe that he's going to be gone and forgotten. But as of now, he's been put in his place by some.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics...ws&date=022217
I didn't know his name until early last week. Not really.
He seems smart, even if a little bit damaged. Maybe he can go forward and just wipe the *cough* egg off of his face and just go forward.
Certainly said in that news conference that he's still planning on his book getting published, etc.
}, Milo simply contradicted most everything Maher said with rolling eyes, batted eyelashes and outrageous bullshit comebacks. And spouting alt-right stupidity. A true narcissist, in the model of his beloved Twitler, whom he called "fabulous." 
