BB brought to my attention

Studies have shown an increase in the number of seniors with STDs and HIV.Viagra,Cialis and other drugs for ED have increased the sexuality in seniors.You have guys that feel they can pay more for BB service and you have some ladies desperate enough to do anything. Whatever logic they are using is unsafe.

Cleanliness and safety is ALWAYS my first concern.....No cover.. No stinger....and like most bbbj is almost mandatory ..... But to put the shoe on the other foot .....the question was brought up about the safety of bbbj...... Is daty any less dangerous...body fluid is body fluid .....and don't misunderstand ...... Daty in most cases is as importent as bbbj..... I just dearly love to eat pussy........but????? If we're talking safety....

It's all risky, yes. We are all doing each other around here. How many degrees of separation? BBBJ on a penis that stays covered during fs is less risky. It's not just providers and hobbyists, the SO's could be having bb sex.

I think people decide in there heads the level of safety their willing to accept. If you believe that oral sex is more safe than bbfs well continue on. But a std is a std it doesnt matter how you got it. Truth be told i rather have it in my pants and cure it than around my mouth. One thing i have noticed is that there is a lack of talk about the dangers of oral sex and std maybe most people don't want to accept that its real but it is. One day we might have that adult conversation.

Hell, the massage parlor girls offer it all the time. Especially the older ones. I have been with several that didn't strap a rubber on until I told them to. They were going to fuck me bareback without it. Hey, there obviously is a cliental for it that doesn't give a shit if they get a disease or give you a disease. These guys are only living for the moment and not for the future. The spa workers don't give a shit either as long as they can get a repeat customer from it. I would imagine that the PM's you are getting are from clients that are curious as to who provides bareback so they can go get them some. Afterall, there's nothing like shooting your cumload in a hot, juicy pulsating pussy. It's just that the risk is too damn big that your going to catch something.

Well I'm surprised at the comments that attempt to claim that BBBJ is 'safer' than bbfs. All that means is your going to contract it in your mouth instead of between your legs. In the military they show films before you go overseas of all kinds of STD's that you can get almost anywhere. Hands, fingers, tongue, lips, mouth, eyes, throat, etc. I don't believe anyone on this board is that naive or that stupid to honestly beleive that they aren't risking the possibility of contracting or spreading a std because "all they do is bbbj not bbfs". If you BBBJ someone with an STD, you are just as likely to contract it than you would be if you did bbfs. The point being to not kid yourself, if you're doing BBBJ it the same as bbfs but your mouth is being used as a pussy. Tomato, tomato!

I just had a client ask me for BBFS. They ask. Some may provide such. I wouldn't.

Hell, the massage parlor girls offer it all the time. Especially the older ones. I have been with several that didn't strap a rubber on until I told them to. They were going to fuck me bareback without it. Hey, there obviously is a cliental for it that doesn't give a shit if they get a disease or give you a disease. These guys are only living for the moment and not for the future. The spa workers don't give a shit either as long as they can get a repeat customer from it. I would imagine that the PM's you are getting are from clients that are curious as to who provides bareback so they can go get them some. Afterall, there's nothing like shooting your cumload in a hot, juicy pulsating pussy. It's just that the risk is too damn big that your going to catch something. Originally Posted by jizmloaded

I heard that the AMP ladies PREFER BBFS. Some have even pushed for it. Is it a cultural thing/ Or do they have ulterior motives? Hoping to get pregnant by an American for US status? Be careful of those AMPs!

I heard that the AMP ladies PREFER BBFS. Some have even pushed for it. Is it a cultural thing/ Or do they have ulterior motives? Hoping to get pregnant by an American for US status? Be careful of those AMPs! Originally Posted by incognito isis

maybe they don't like latex. could be cultural bias against latex or rubber, maybe its the man-hood thing. dunno, not enough info here in this case.

somebody's gonna have to TOFTT and ask them about it.

um, now jizm is claiming that the older ladies (I'm assuming he's talking 40+) tend to be more bb oriented, then pregnancy wouldn't be a factor in that case.

I heard that the AMP ladies PREFER BBFS. Some have even pushed for it. Is it a cultural thing/ Or do they have ulterior motives? Hoping to get pregnant by an American for US status? Be careful of those AMPs! Originally Posted by incognito isis

That has not been my experience. Some time back, I called on two at one time, and each brought her own supply. You might say it was a "musical hats" session.

Well I'm surprised at the comments that attempt to claim that BBBJ is 'safer' than bbfs. All that means is your going to contract it in your mouth instead of between your legs. In the military they show films before you go overseas of all kinds of STD's that you can get almost anywhere. Hands, fingers, tongue, lips, mouth, eyes, throat, etc. I don't believe anyone on this board is that naive or that stupid to honestly beleive that they aren't risking the possibility of contracting or spreading a std because "all they do is bbbj not bbfs". If you BBBJ someone with an STD, you are just as likely to contract it than you would be if you did bbfs. The point being to not kid yourself, if you're doing BBBJ it the same as bbfs but your mouth is being used as a pussy. Tomato, tomato! Originally Posted by Shadowbeast666

I was in the military too and saw those same films. It really makes no difference in the sceme of things. A STD is a STD and you can think its better but most people assume there the responsible ones by just doing unprotected oral sex. I admit that i do engage in unprotected oral sex many of times but thats just me but im not that dumb to assume that the risk arent there. I for one know that most providers wouldn't stop offering BBBJ because if they do business is gone. But there are some providers out there who make it with doing CBJ and not allowing daty if they would make their service a little more personal and inviting I think a lot of guys who claim to be the safety minded hobbist would follow suit.

I actually had a former client tell me that he was sure that he was the only one that a certain provider did bbfs with. I knew better, but there was no convincing him. He was just sure he knew her better than that.

It's funny the things that your mind can talk yourself into and rationalize away.

i think it's funny how some people think a condom could prevent most diseases, fact is, condoms don't prevent as much disease as you think, aids can easily pass through a condom as it is pourous and the virus is small enough, much smaller than sperm, which is what condoms are really for. and condoms do not prevent contact of all your genitalia, so you're still very much at risk for things like herpes and hpv, in fact, the worst diseases, the incurables, are the ones that a condom really doesn't help with. will it decrease your chances? yes, but don't go around thinking a condom will prevent you from getting a disease, that's just ignorant. wear a condom, but more importantly, try to stay with cleaner ones. Baton rouge scares the crap out of me with it's aids reputation, when i was in school there i kept my dick in my pants for the most part, I waited for trips out of town to have my one nighters

in fact, healthcare for escorts that includes regular testing is a huge reason why making it legal would benefit people greatly

I hear you lily on that one. Most of these guys really believe in there mind these things. No disrespect to any providers but everyone one goes bareback with someone even providers.