It was a liberal meltdown on Twitter tonight and it was glorious

I'm not here to answer your question the way you want them answered, berry. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Clearly because you can't. Because if you did it would show you are a fraud and your earlier post either showed your lack of knowledge or was intentionally false. What is it?

These are really simple questions:

Are you saying you really don't understand how this was not public information?

Are you admitting you are so naive to not understand how this information can put someone in harm's way?

It is laughable you can't answer them but par for the course for you.

As to this, you realized you were exposed and tried to quickly pivot and edit your post 11

So are you saying a company's Terms of Service don't apply?

You're made a TOS argument no one was disputing. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Actually you did in post 7. Did you already forget what you wrote. Or are you purposely trying to ignore it? You know

Doxxing requires malicious intent, not just you or Elon telling us so

Show the proof . . . The actual factual proof.

Nope the TOS is quite clear on that, doxxing of private information is prohibited, period. And the TOS is part of the proof, the actual factual proof no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise because you have been exposed yet again

I know exactly what I wrote, and how you're conflating it as predicted.

I've not been talking about how Twitter'a TOS defines doxxing or even what the policy changes were about. That where your logic train derailed and why you're not in command of the facts here.

The rest of the bluster is just fluffy bullshit without ever really addressing the point.

I know exactly what I wrote, and how you're conflating it as predicted.

I've not been talking about how Twitter'a TOS defines doxxing or even what the policy changes were about. That where your logic train derailed and why you're not in command of the facts here.
Originally Posted by HDGristle

LOL - you out yourself yet again. You are so predictable

Everyone can see when you are called out for your lies you try to deflect and change course

Again - they were simple questions yet you refuse to answer because you know in doing so you would be exposed yet again

Sad

This is a master stroke by Elon

It’s hilarious that in the space of two weeks Elon got the crazy ass left to stop yelling that free speech is a threat to democracy & start yelling that censorship (against them) is violence.

All it took for the shitlib corporate media to suddenly turn Pro Free Speech on Social Media was to ban a few journalists. Just shows how out of touch they have been this whole time and they thought they were exempt from the rules for some reason.

Can't wait to see Elon's next move !!!!!!

I suspect it is coming

Boom - just as I suspected more was coming.

Elon Musk - So inspiring to see the newfound love of freedom of speech by the press

Happy Freedom Friday - multiple well known conservative accounts reinstated today including

James O'Keefe
Mike Lindell
Gateway Pundit
Emerald Robinson
and others

PLUS another edition of the Twitter Files expose
Matt Taibbi - COMING TODAY:

TWITTER: THE FBI SUBSIDIARY

Exposed? Hilarious.

Pivoting? Consistent as can be.

Out myself? Starting to read like a bad fanfic.

TWK's got a much more cogent, reasoned, engaging and effective position on this in another thread you might want to borrow.

The point you keep dodging is that Elon had to adjust his policy to specifically target the kids with a bastadized, overly expansive take on speech he himself committed to protecting and failed at miserably. I don't care what the TOS says today because if it were doxxing he would have already been justified in immediately banning it.

News flash It's not. Adjusting the TOS to selectively target this is how he's justifying the action and pretending the kid actually doxxed him.

No one disputes the current reading of the rules. But that's not even the issue. Pull your head out of the sand.

Yep. Exposed. You out yourself as a fraud

You lied and everyone can see it

You were scared to answer a couple simple questions

Par for the course with you

You can't handle the fact that your fellow crazy leftist propaganda pushers got banned for breaking the rules on doxxing. You can't handle the fact that disclosing non-public information on someone is dangerous

Pathetic

You keep hanging your hat on that non-public part. How he did it is well documented. The FAA options were well documented. The lack of partisanship on the part of one of the primary sources of transponder data is well documented. And you're still conflating the argument because you swallowed the baited hook he's resting on to pretend he was doxxed because you like the taste of how he used it for vengeful retribution.

Musk loves free speech so much he’s hoarding it all for himself.

It’s hilarious watching him ban everyone that reports on his idiocy. Like watching Elmer Fudd fighting a thousand online Bugs Bunnies.

And yet it is non public data

And you know it or you would have proven it otherwise
But you can't so you bloviate and deflect like you always do

Anyone who has paid attention here knows your silly act

Musk loves free speech so much he’s hoarding it all for himself.

It’s hilarious watching him ban everyone that reports on his idiocy. Like watching Elmer Fudd fighting a thousand online Bugs Bunnies. Originally Posted by Mistershark

Reports on what?

Do you even understand why these leftist propaganda organs were banned? It appears you do not

And yet it is non public data

And you know it or you would have proven it otherwise
But you can't so you bloviate and deflect like you always do

Anyone who has paid attention here knows your silly act Originally Posted by berryberry

C'mon Berry. Do I need to walk you through ADS-B data? Websites owned by Dan Streufert that don't use FAA feeds and instead are crowdsourced? Elon's apparent lack of using the FAA programs available to encrypt his ADS-B signals? And the ability to use public data to determine corporate ownership of registered property?

Add a dash of coding the algorithms and automation and you've got a bot pulling data and posting it to Twitter based on publicly available data.

C'mon Berry. Do I need to walk you through ADS-B data? Websites owned by Dan Streufert that don't use FAA feeds and instead are crowdsourced? Elon's apparent lack of using the FAA programs available to encrypt his ADS-B signals? And the ability to use public data to determine corporate ownership of registered property?

Add a dash of coding the algorithms and automation and you've got a bot pulling data and posting it to Twitter based on publicly available data. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Aww Gristle, do I have to walk you through the FAA's PIA privacy program for a private plane ID? You know, the one Elon uses to keep the plane info anonymous and private, not public?

Aww Gristle, do I have to walk you through the FAA's PIA privacy program for a private plane ID? You know, the one Elon uses to keep the plane info anonymous and private, not public? Originally Posted by berryberry

Nope and I'm glad you picked up the breadcrumb. Don't focus on the Pool discussion.

Sweeney actually suggested he use PIA as part of their ongoing discussions and Sweeney was still able to identify the plane using public data, including the non-FAA data available plus good old fashioned logic

https://interestingengineering.com/c...-fly-incognito

Keep going. There's more if you want to keep mining this particular set of facts. I told you, I've got links cocked and loaded on this and the fact that I mentioned Pool means you know it's true.

This has been one of the more entertaining ways Sweeney has been outplaying Musk since the tracker went live and whenever Musk jukes Sweeney connects the dots. Even when he switches planes.

The same fake news liars who said they would delete their accounts if Elon bought it are crying about being blocked