We can argue about the injustices of short sentences for rapists and pedophiles all day long...but I agree with harsh sentences for animal abusers. I have three dogs...and they're not pets, they're part of my family as much as anyone else. To see the things that people do to animals disgusts me.Whoaaa! While it's probably true that abusing an animal rates a serious penalty, let's not cross into the "animals are people" territory. They are not. They are pets, beasts of burden, and sources of food. But they are NOT people.
Not to mention the fact that it's been said time and time again that abusing animals is a "gateway drug" of sorts into harming people. Originally Posted by St. Francisco
Whoaaa! While it's probably true that abusing an animal rates a serious penalty, let's not cross into the "animals are people" territory. They are not. They are pets, beasts of burden, and sources of food. But they are NOT people. Originally Posted by EnergyAs a psychologist I want you to consider two things: People , who torture animals for fun are known to be one of the persons later known as psychopaths. It is in almost every history of people who committed crimes to humans later on. People usually ignore these signs, because of the said notion you do. It was visible already in their youth, but their parents chose to ignore it, until they killed and abused humans.
As a psychologist I want you to consider two things: People , who torture animals for fun are known to be one of the persons later known as psychopaths. It is in almost every history of people who committed crimes to humans later on. People usually ignore these signs, because of the said notion you do. It was visible already in their youth, but their parents chose to ignore it, until they killed and abused humans.
In my school was a case of someone being psychopath and he killed his sister and the sister already warned her parents about these things, that he was torturing cats and dogs and that he was evil with her as well. Everyone ignored her. But now she is dead. Congratulations on human reasoning.
So, given your assumption that animals are no "persons" (which I call wrong, no one of us has the right to judge this) why does it happen that people that torture animals are also prone to abusing humans? Must be a relations.
Animals with a limbic system (the one with emotions) ARE indeed persons. They do have personality.
And if you go in a Nature Park and see some bears , then tell me again who is on top of the "food chain" , ok )). I think we need to re-think the notion that creatures that are helpless to us, are free to be done with whatever we wish. I don`t think this is correct. we are smart enough to be protective and have some insight. Even my cats do have insight (sometimes I assume more than humans, no pun intended) because they very well can make a difference when playing with their nails and when playing normally.
I also have a problem with so called "pretentious animal lovers" who exchange their pets all the time as soon as they really need to care about them, instead of using them to fulfill their needs. Christmas presents to kids or whoever else are a great example of that. Many animals end up in shelters later on because no one really cares about them, and they see a big dog not as cute anymore as baby dog. But - instead of getting smart and not having animals or pets, they do the same mistake later on again and again. Brrr.... It shosws a lack of emotion or carelessness on the human side, and does reveal a lot about character to me. I never understood people who have pets and then give them away and then take on another few. Scary. Makes me wonder on how they treat humans?
And the animals develop nasty behaviour because people don`t care for them and their needs. It is really hard to win the trust of such animals again. Originally Posted by ninasastri
And in the future, you'll find lot's of topics like that in the National Co-Ed Forum and we'll reserve D&T for things related to sex and beautiful women and the lustful men who chase after them. Originally Posted by John BullThis is an intelligent discussion with (mostly) well researched opinions. I consider this to be exactly the sort of conversation Diamonds and Tuxedos would enjoy engaging in. Does the content matter more than the interaction?
Enjoy discussing cruelty to animals? Surely you jest! I find nothing enjoyable about that subject and unless a person is the kind of freak who would engage in that activity, I can't imagine anyone else does either.What is the National Co-Ed Discussion Board? The National Board? I agree with you that this is not one of my most sexy postings on a escort board, but respect is for sure something that matters, also to animals. But if it`s not the right post for this Area, I agree to just "put" it somewhere else. Would you mind doing that and moving the thread to where its accurate? Thanks and sorry for posting in the wrong area .
Take it to National Co-Ed Discussion. Originally Posted by John Bull
http://www.eccie.net/forumdisplay.php?f=5Thanks And sorry again, I see that some of my posts are perfectly "off topic" so to speak I will try to be more "sexy" in the future
Try this Nina. It's called Main Discussion and would be perfect for this subject. Originally Posted by John Bull
Enjoy discussing cruelty to animals? Surely you jest! I find nothing enjoyable about that subject and unless a person is the kind of freak who would engage in that activity, I can't imagine anyone else does either.Well, I meant an intelligent exchange of differing opinions on any subject is an enjoyable way to converse, but when you put it that way I see your point. It is a very unsavory topic and it's too bad the subject exists at all in life.
Take it to National Co-Ed Discussion. Originally Posted by John Bull