WK gets provider banned

I didn't think the restaurant analogy was your strongest. Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

Ouch - especially since I was proud of it! LOL

JC, your board presence is appreciated.

He did not say that: Originally Posted by jackfengshui

It was worded strange as the former member gets pissed if his old handle comes up. and I did not want to call out others that share ROS with providers as he did.

But now if you share it with her. And latter she posts about it as she did in the 2nd link. Well its short ban for her now. I think it should have been both. But that is not the ruling from admins. Only she gets it. I get from it if you want providers posting, don't tell her ROS. That way she can't mess up. What she does not know can't hurt her.

Now when this came up before in Upset NY(long ago). Providers did state that yes he(former member) shared ROS with me. Now they could get banned for just that.

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap
Interesting to me, I was called out in another review, by a former mod, who claimed reviews here were just like reviews of new restaurants.

Wakeup's reviews on this board are great errr and they are restaurant reviews. To bad none around here.

The behavior of the OP in the Houston thread has been a point of debate for years. The whole thing would have gone away had he not started the thread asking for modtard ruling. There are several old timers on that thread that have issues with the modtards, mostly because the icky's modtards are not the old aspd crew and cronies. Believe me in the aspd days there was a lot more flaming, and banning, for no reason. Houston was not for the thin skinned.

Moderating is an art. There is no science to it. Houston has modtards that let threads go and die natural deaths. Its rare, nowadays, when a thread gets closed. That is not to say that the inmates run the asylum. It is also rare when an OP will get his/her request to close a thread due to the tide turning against them, the thought process is you started it so now you deal with it.

CFE is a beautiful and classy lady. Her business will not suffer from this ban, I imagine her p411 requests are off the charts.

PS. Taint photos are always welcome to every thread.

I like how Blowpop contradicts himself so he can rationalize he's not to blame.

Them bitches never did shut the fuck up.......well, one of them did........ijs

Them bitches never did shut the fuck up.......well, one of them did........ijs Originally Posted by dearhunter

Too fucking funny!

Thanks Dearhunter!



elg.......

mmmm I was thinkin this would go longer. Well it will when it happens here again......

as the threads not locked in Houston are still growing.

No reason to lock, so they stay open to die a natural death ... as it should be.

he he..

I don't understand what just happened. JONBALLS posted a Weezer video with Happy Days as the backdrop on a drama thread in the Houston Co-Ed section and then has his account disabled?

Goodness knows I don't need to know. Just found it curious. Originally Posted by proudoftexas

O Hai!!! ( 1 2)
theCFE

She is back now. Starting a campaign to change the guidelines. I don't agree with her idea's. But hay, some of ya may.

also the first link is still on going.

O Hai!!! ( 1 2)
theCFE

She is back now. Starting a campaign to change the guidelines. I don't agree with her idea's. But hay, some of ya may.

also the first link is still on going. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

Very classy girl, OSD!


elg.....

Thank you, all! I don't know how much of a campaign it might be. I just feel that, if people don't like the way things are going in their world, they have a unique opportunity here in America to speak out about them. The thing is, you can complain to your buddies at the bar about an issue, and they may agree or disagree, but complaining to your buddy won't change a thing. Complaining to the people who are capable of changing things you want to change makes far more sense.

My particular situation was unique and confusing. I can't say the situation will ever come up again. In my case, simply acknowledging that a review was accurate was enough to be banned, while the guidelines state that revealing private details is what is the big no-no. I know enough to not reveal details, so I thought I was within the rules. Clearly, the wording is vague enough that there was a lot of confusion over whether an infraction took place at all. My interpretation is that one did not, but I am more than happy to abide by whatever rules, guidelines, or repercussions the staff decide upon. If it were not for my providing, my alignment would be Lawful Good, but with that particular facet of my life, I'm firmly Neutral Good. Given my alignment, it came as a bit of a shock that I had broken any rules, as I do try to toe that line with care.

As far as the issue of whether providers should be allowed to know the contents of their own reviews - there is precedence for this on other boards. I believe there's a huge money making opportunity here, and I have some great ideas on how to implement it, supposing anyone is interested.

Have a wonderful day, everyone, and thank you for taking interest in little ol' me. /curtesy

I checked.........not interested

It would be nice if you could purchase a large banner in each of the major forums........just tell them "deerhunter" sent you and you will get the special rate.