Why wouldn't you see a spinner and why?

I know this, I like the female genitalia whether on a person considered a spinner or someone called voluptuous. I like it!!!! I am more attracted to thin ladies, but I do enjoy some more curvy women. I am not that attracted to women that are not in my age group, just think the conversation is lost. A person within 6 years of my age understands where I am in life and the conversation seems to flow better. No, I am not in college any more and I do not have papers due, no I do not have young children anymore, no I am not retired and I did not fall and can't get up! So, for me age is important when booking, just me.

That being said I have seen some gorgeous 21 year old ads!! But I have never booked a session with one, youngest I have ever gone is 26 and I had the feeling she had to do some growing up never repeated with her, but she was a knock out!!! Oldest I gone is 47 again very little in common. And I would consider the 26 year old a spinner.

A woman's body size does not determine her vagina size or depth.I've seen "spinners" take it all and some can't.I've bottom out in average ladies and bbw.Jacquie said it best its going to take some time.It takes a little time for women to adjust.getting her aroused is a must.Some women vagina's relax after an orgasm and others may constrict. Originally Posted by The.Prince

I agree with the "it takes time" and "it takes arousal" sentiment you have here. Time is usually never an issue in my civilian life with the spinners I've seen and dated. And it usually isn't a problem in the hobby world for me with because I book a large block of time. I'm all about putting in the time, effort, and energy to make sure she gets where she needs to be. So how much time are you talking?

Now I noticed you also quoted although briefly that..."I've bottom out in average ladies and bbw." I agree and have never had these issues arise at all.

But you also said..."I've seen "spinners" take it all and some can't." So what was the issues with the spinners that couldn't? Any of the above categories.

I hate to point out the obvious here, but how much you can take in your vagina has NOTHING to do with your body weight.............but that has nothing to do with how muich she can take. She may not be able to perform certain positions, but it would seem to me that someone small would be even more able to be tossed around.

Why not just put a poll that asks, "Would you see a girl with a small vagina" lol. Originally Posted by London Rayne

I don't understand clearly what you are saying, but what I'm gathering from this excerpt is you say body size has nothing to do with depth or full penetration vaginally. I get that.

But then you say that "she may not be able to perform certain positions." And that in and of itself is sorta contradictory to the above comment.

I tend to like K-9 and ACG positions a lot because those positions allow for the most satisfying inner means of sexual intercourse in my opinion. I noticed you commented that ACG on men 5" and above is not an option for you as a position. Would it be safe to assume based on your quote that those two positions tend to be the most limited ones for spinners in general? Are more so women in general.

I appreciate your input thus far.

I think what we are all trying to say is that stereotyping any group of people is not a logical thing to do.

I think what we are all trying to say is that stereotyping any group of people is not a logical thing to do. Originally Posted by DallasRain

Bravo!! Now.... wasn't that easy to understand?

I think what we are all trying to say is that stereotyping any group of people is not a logical thing to do. Originally Posted by DallasRain

Thank God...or I wouldn't be seen by anyone!!!!

Gimme that, since I am not a spinner and can't really speak for all women, I am merely commenting on my personal experience since it contradicts the spinner comments. No way I could ever do greek with even an average size but have read numerous reviews of women half my size who take more than 6 no problem...front and back.

I think Dallas summed it up. Since it is not BMI that determines what one can handle, basing a thread on a weight scale rather than a vaginal scale makes little sense. I can see posting a pole about what guys are more attracted to, but I have never heard anyone complain about this from a general group. What one spinner can't do another can...same with bbw, average, etc.

It's all in what an indivudual is capable of, rather than a certain group. I guess if we are going to ask this question why not ask why the majority of escorts don't see black men...bet you a million bucks it has nothing to do with race, but with size...at least that is the general stereotype lol.

I know you mean well and are not trying to be an azz, so I can grasp what you are asking. I just don't think it makes a whole lot of sense to many guys when choosing whether they will see a spinner or not. Most guys are not hung if you will, so they don't really have to worry about that lol.

I have heard it's always the average and below average guys who insist on having escorts who look like little girls. It seems to make them feel more manly to have this little thing they can toss around lol.

Then you have the "little man" syndrome, where shorter guys won't see a tall girl because she intimidates them.

Aint the hobby just grand...so many different needs and people to suit them.

I myself am pretty petite... I'm 5'4 and about 115-120 lbs and for the most part have no issues with larger men. I have to agree every woman's body is different and her physical size,weight, and body shape have nothing to do with how much she can take.**things tend to slide in better when wet !!**

Ivana is 5' 10". Hang me from ceiling fan, I spin lilke helicopter.

I think what we are all trying to say is that stereotyping any group of people is not a logical thing to do. Originally Posted by DallasRain

Definitely not stereotyping anyone although I know some people can misread posts easily and jump to conclusions and assume it as such. It happens...I came into the thread with relatively no first hand info on spinners besides my first hand experiences. I also asked some of my fellow hobbyist their opinions on it prior to even contemplating seeing spinners. I think I came into this thread although in a more direct manner.... with sincerity to at least see if others shared my experiences.

The ladies opinion I value just as much. There was truthfully no easy way to ask.

Bravo!! Now.... wasn't that easy to understand? Originally Posted by MrGiz

Yep it was. I assumed beforehand that the people who see spinners regularly might be thin skinned or sensitive and see my info inquiry as a thinly veiled attack or disrespect, when it was nowhere near so. Just somethings I noticed.

Initially I was gonna post this thread in the locker room, so other potential hobbyist who shared similar "hidden intangibles" and experiences to mine might offer perspective to me. But since most of the most regular posters and reviewers have somewhat of a track record of ladies they like I already knew more so the guys who may have an aversion to this thread. But if I posted there, I would not know of the general consensus of the women in general. Locally I was kinda expecting the responses I got based on some of the other ladies prior post. Although London seemed to touch upon more of some of the "other sensitive an unspoken factors" that might be important to consider and ponder as well.

I figured it would be more beneficial to others and more people might respond and lend perspective if it was coed. Then I decided that I wanted to make the vote by members hidden so as not to cock block anyone from seeing a spinner or any type of lady based on their experiences. You wont believe how some people can take a post and run off with it, posting and pming alerts as why not to see someone......I know .....I know its funny as hell lol.

I have received pm's from hobbyists about this who mostly chose not to respond. Some wont respond so earnestly and honestly here because they feel it will be used against them in seeing other ladies. They feel like they have to limit what they say and what they choose to say might hinder them from seeing certain ladies. They feel as though they have to cater and pander to whats on the board via posts and tell me their real thoughts about the topic backchannel. I can understand sympatize with them in their plight in looking at the last few posts which seem to be aimed at me and I never had that purpose. I have a tendency to just tell it like it is, and I just could not bite my tongue anymore as I was merely just curious. Not trying to stir a pot.

No hateration in this dancery......just curious.

I have never heard anyone complain about this from a general group. Originally Posted by London Rayne

First time for everything. I still don't regret asking in retrospect.

I guess if we are going to ask this question why not ask why the majority of escorts don't see black men...bet you a million bucks it has nothing to do with race, but with size...at least that is the general stereotype lol. Originally Posted by London Rayne

I tried like hell to keep that little tidbit out of the equation although I know its one of those ymmv hidden intangibles. There are way too many entertaining threads in houston alone that will cater to that one. lol
Id rather the thread stay open before its abruptly closed so I can at least know something beforehand.

I know you mean well and are not trying to be an azz, so I can grasp what you are asking. I just don't think it makes a whole lot of sense to many guys when choosing whether they will see a spinner or not. Most guys are not hung if you will, so they don't really have to worry about that lol........I have heard it's always the average and below average guys who insist on having escorts who look like little girls. It seems to make them feel more manly to have this little thing they can toss around lol.

Then you have the "little man" syndrome, where shorter guys won't see a tall girl because she intimidates them.

Aint the hobby just grand...so many different needs and people to suit them. Originally Posted by London Rayne

I'm not hung either, but I tend to be a little above average. I have heard most of your reply above from other providers I know. I admit I'm sorta surprised to see someone actually post this though. Kudos to you for that set of replys. I was hoping someone might touch upon that. I figured to some extent this was a factor too.

I love tall women!! I am short and everyone who has been around knows I see a taller woman, look at my reviews. I look for 5' 8" and taller and have asked this particular woman to wear her stripper shoes before making her even taller. I like it.

London I know you were generalizing, no big deal. I am a person with confidence and am lucky to not have any of those syndromes you mentioned. I know my abilities and limitations and have come to completely accept them. I do not know the size of my manhood, I think I am average, from seeing porn. I do not dwell on my size, does not matter to me, nothing I can do about what my maker gave to me, I just enjoy it as much as I can and always attempt to have my partner enjoy as well.

I do not think the definition of a spinner has anything to do with height but then again I agree with a previous post "What is the Definition of a Spinner?"

Gimme.... there's nothing wrong with asking any set of questions you want! But, don't you think it's kinda silly to allege thin skin at the same time you're bemoaning some of the open and frank replies you've received to those same open and frank questions? You asked the questions.... probably left out a couple that would have made the topic a bit more comprehensive.... and have recieved a few answers which attempt to close that gap. I think several here were just trying to give a comprehensive answer to the basic premise of the poll.

From my experience (which includes many spinners).... size of the woman has very little to do with her stamina or cavernous qualities.... but that explanation was not included in the poll.

Hope that helps a bit,
Giz

[I hate the adjective "thick" for the record in relation to body type. It's so inappropriately used in the context of describing body weight. It's like some dumbass girl shouting "random" when the conversation was odd yet calculated. TFox & I are about the same btw.]

The ratio of my puss size to my weight has NOTHING to do with how much dick I can take. My SO and I were talking about this last night. He's overwhelmingly well-equipped in terms of girth and length, but he pointed out that my vagina had almost an alarm clock on it where it said, "I can't take no more!" He went down on me for thirty minutes... and I was still having problems with getting myself prepared for it. With a previous SO, he had a much smaller package, and we could have sex for several hours without problems. It has nothing to do with these men's levels of skills-- I blame it all on my tricky vajay.

No choices?
Either you do not like spinners or you do not like spinners
There are no choices in this poll only a statement that the pole starter just does not like spinners?

No choices?
Either you do not like spinners or you do not like spinners
There are no choices in this poll only a statement that the pole starter just does not like spinners? Originally Posted by IronMan

double negatives?