I've engaged in a few threesomes, but frankly they've never done all that much for me. At best I enjoyed the experience only slightly more, if at all, than a one-on-one.I agree with him.
However, probably unlike most guys, I never really got that much of a thrill out of seeing girl-on-girl action. Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight
I think several have hit on a key problem. One hour, or even ninety minutes is just too short. Two hours is a good minimum. Maybe even longer as you need plenty of recharge time to fully enjoy. But because you're compensating two people, the costs escalate pretty quickly. So I've pretty well decided that optimal threesomes are a very rich man's game. I'd love to do a two or three day one, however. Originally Posted by TexTushHogTwo or three days? My lord you are a feral hog. I would have a heart attack and drop dead.Also I would need viagra.
There is a lot of truth to what you are saying.When it comes to the average ,passing fantasy reality rarely lives up to the hype.But there are those fantasy's that are more personal, and can be so hard wired into your mind that sometimes reality does live up to or even surpass the original dream. I love when that happens because for me that offers great masturbation material for many months after. Originally Posted by Becky[Pulls up a chair....sits down...leans in....]
............... but i will admit, most girls that say they provide a two girl show, it is exactly just that: A SHOW!!... Originally Posted by brooke_banks69I met a friend at the St. Regis once for some basic fun. Before you know it, we were on EROS looking for a third. We picked out this lovely brunette woman that was available on short notice. When she showed up, she showed up with another woman…………weird? Well actually, it was a bit weird. The other woman said she was the girlfriend of the woman we called, and that she would just wait in the living room whilst we retired to the bedroom.