Describe the proof that you would accept as evidence of fraud? That's the problem. The democrats, who have been claiming fraud for the last four years, are now moving the goal posts. First, it was there is no fraud, we've been lying for the last four years. Then was there was incompetence but that's not fraud. Which became, there was fraud but not enough to change the outcome of the election (which election? We've had some congressional candidates win after being declared the loser) to we want hard evidence of fraud which we now admit to but we're going to do a Bart Simpson, No one saw me do it, so I didn't do it, and no one can prove anything. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
You know what I'm talking about, Cornhole. Don't be obtuse. Proof that will overturn the election. Whatever kind of proof can be provided that will overturn the election. It's up to you to determine what that would take. Convince me. Then I'll embrace it.
