An Open Apology to Lola

I miss you beauty ❤️

You always getting information mixed up or completely leaving out pertinent data.
The lady you speak of was Banned & returned with the same username,
Lola was NOT the first person that noticed and was going with a decision the staff had previously made.
Several people noticed and made comments. Don't put all the blame on one person.
You have an agenda to single out Lola.

Now, as far as you Sir, help the community by writing reviews in order to help ladies.
Thank You for supporting single Mommies Originally Posted by Busty

So, I posted an apology for a review that I made that wasn't entirely accurate. Unfortunately, this apology came too late for the forum moderators because it was seen as rectifying a post that was over 30 days old. I understand the reasoning behind such a rule; but, disagree on it's usage in this instance since I, the OP, had new information that was pertinent to the community. I'm sure this post will be removed, as well, but I honestly don't care. And, I'm sure it will have negative ramifications for my account but I'm okay with that, as well. Anyway, the post was this one:

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2993053

It was a positive review of my actual encounter with Lola but it followed a negative review for not being able to see her again. It was very wrong of me to not respect the screening process she has in place and I should never have made the negative review. Some came to the post to defend me, but they were wrong, as well. She isn't crazy, she just has a process that some of us, "good guys" that think we should get through, don't. We should respect that and move on. I should've done so and I, again, want to apologize for not. If you can see her, I would highly recommend it. Originally Posted by karmachameleon

The guideline states

In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time

Lola is worth the drama she has caused on ourhome 2? She came unhinged on ourhome, then started another thread until Mokoa said enough. Anyone else would have been banned immediately. Whatever she has going on with ck is their business but I would never. This lady is showing signs of she has been in the hobby too long and is about to crack. Lady went on for 5 pages on ourhome then added drama to her actual ad. No one does that. In my opinion she is absolutely not worth the extra. No lady does what she did Originally Posted by HakunaMatata

I don't know what goes on at OH2, that place has always been a little off to me. Plus, whatever it is, it's off topic. I agree with others, that Lola, to me, is worth the fallout from my apology. It wasn't meant to make myself look good or win over the community. I fully expected to be chastised and added to dns lists. I'm okay with that. Part of making amends is excepting the consequences of the actions you're seeking to amend.

Both parties have had their say and others have commented as well. This one has run its course. Closing the thread. Thanks