FBI Comey: Hillary did it but there will be no charges.

He doesn't have a lot to worry about since the FBI would be conducting the "investigation," and they don't know what "intent" is or how to prove it. Originally Posted by LexusLover

They give a hell of a moralistic tongue lashing, though.

If you want to see how the typical library acts just stick a probe in Munchkins ass and follow his reaction.

You know I reference Comey's press conference and Munchkin still wants a source.... sheesh! What are moroon. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I asked why you didn't post a link. You didn't because you don't.

I asked you nothing about the information because why would I ask you, one of the most link challenged posters on here, for help finding the press conference?

Reading comprehension. Yours gets worse all the time.
It was a 3 sentence post. One sentence had 2 words. One had 4 words.
And you still don't get it. Good thing your limits only limit you.

Here's your fuckin' link, asshole!

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system

This is the part I find most interesting and I'm sure will come up tomorrow during Comey's interview with the House of Representatives' committee...

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."

"Sanctions" or jail time?

First off, Hillary isn't "my girl". Another lie by you. I have stated many times that this is another election with no suitable candidates. I have also said I will be voting against trump. Reading comprehension lets you down again.

Somehow the 146 brain cells you still have left have missed the fact that there seem to be 2 liars in the race.

Out of 175 statements, Trump has 77% ( 134) of those statements rated as mostly false, false, or pants on fire. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

Out of 221 statements, Clinton has 27% ( 61) of those statements rated as mostly false, false, or pants on fire. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

Now for my reaction.
I am disappointed these are the "best" people our political system can produce. It doesn't outrage me when someone lies to cover their ass (defensive lie) as much as someone who makes up shit about somebody (offensive lie).
No one gets a pass though. A lie is a lie.

And too bad you don't hold yourself to anything remotely near what you hold others to.

Here's a fact idiot, your girl Hillary is a world class liar. She has been completely exposed for lying. Now comes your reaction to being lied to. Are you going to be outraged that she would think you're so stupid. Are you disappointed that she did lie (meaning you believed in her completely). Or do you take a big bite of that turd, smile, and ask for another. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Being a cynic greatly reduces the amount and effect of politicians breaking promises to me. Because all of them do it. They take aim at the lowest common denominator in their base.
Your boy trump likes the poorly educated because they don't call him out on his lies. Because they don't know or care.

One last thing douche-bag.
It's my opinion trump is worse.
It's undeniable fact that trump has told at least as many lies as Clinton has.

First off, Hillary isn't "my girl". Another lie by you. I have stated many times that this is another election with no suitable candidates. I have also said I will be voting against trump. Reading comprehension lets you down again.

Somehow the 146 brain cells you still have left have missed the fact that there seem to be 2 liars in the race.

Out of 175 statements, Trump has 77% ( 134) of those statements rated as mostly false, false, or pants on fire. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

Out of 221 statements, Clinton has 27% ( 61) of those statements rated as mostly false, false, or pants on fire. http://www.politifact.com/personalit...llary-clinton/

Now for my reaction.
I am disappointed these are the "best" people our political system can produce. It doesn't outrage me when someone lies to cover their ass (defensive lie) as much as someone who makes up shit about somebody (offensive lie).
No one gets a pass though. A lie is a lie.

And too bad you don't hold yourself to anything remotely near what you hold others to.

Being a cynic greatly reduces the amount and effect of politicians breaking promises to me. Because all of them do it. They take aim at the lowest common denominator in their base.
Your boy trump likes the poorly educated because they don't call him out on his lies. Because they don't know or care.

One last thing douche-bag.
It's my opinion trump is worse.
It's undeniable fact that trump has told at least as many lies as Clinton has. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Only in the mind of a dim-witted, Kool Aid sucking lib-retard could a lying bitch implementing a failed foreign policy which gets an American ambassador killed be worse than a candidate asking that U.S. immigration laws be enforced, masterdickmuncher.

Ironically, you do all the same actions that you criticize, and you still fail to refute my central point about diversity/affirmative action, aka permanent reparations. Originally Posted by DSK

Your central point? What central point?
Here are your posts.


The election is completely in the bag for Hillary, barring a complete miracle.

Time to consider who will be the best candidate for 2020, and how we can hold onto the House and Senate in the meantime.

Liberals are going to be lording it over us for the rest of our lives. We can only hope our children and grandchildren can save what was once a great nation.

No way will I ever salute the flag or put my hand over my heart for a country run by Hillary Clinton. I will not recite the Pledge of Allegiance even if you put a gun to my head.

White conservative men are the new Black men now. They are going to get revenge on us boys, so get ready.
The central points of this post are you have already given up on the election, that you feel we are no longer a great nation, your "loyalty" to your country comes and goes depending on who the president is, and even if threatened with death won't say something others have died to uphold.

Which brings us to you being afraid of a role reversal and the revenge you fear is coming. I've seen several posts from you in the past days, this one included, where the central point is that you're afraid of being treated like you're black.

Why is that?

I'm not a coward and I demand you either prove it, or meet me in a duel.

Let's just see who the coward is, pussy.

That had nothing to do with your central points.

And I responded in the thread.

Which brings us to;
Ironically, you do all the same actions that you criticize, and you still fail to refute my central point about diversity/affirmative action, aka permanent reparations.

There is nothing to refute concerning your "central point"

I do all the actions I criticize?

Prove it.

Here's your fuckin' link, asshole!

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system

This is the part I find most interesting and I'm sure will come up tomorrow during Comey's interview with the House of Representatives' committee...

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."

"Sanctions" or jail time? Originally Posted by gfejunkie

What the fuck is with these non-reading or non-comprehending colostomy-bags?

I said I'd do it my self.

If you have so much extra time, why don't you volunteer as a big brother and help out a child you forced to be born?

Oh that's right. You don't want anything to do with them after they're born.

793 does not require intent only gross negligence. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

JD, when you were in the Navy and received a document with classified information that was not labeled correctly, was the person who sent it to you prosecuted? Demoted? Or did he or she lose their job?

implementing a failed foreign policy which gets an American ambassador killed. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The CIA hired the local militia for protection, when the attack came they did not show up. That came out in the last hearing that was televised.

Speaking of failed foreign policy, what do you call the Bush43 invasion of Iraq? Two trillion spent, 4 thousand dead and the only WMD's found were designed by and purchased from the USA. That was in the New York Times link that was posted by J.D. Barleycorn.

The CIA hired the local militia for protection, when the attack came they did not show up. That came out in the last hearing that was televised.

Speaking of failed foreign policy, what do you call the Bush43 invasion of Iraq? Two trillion spent, 4 thousand dead and the only WMD's found were designed by and purchased from the USA. That was in the New York Times link that was posted by J.D. Barleycorn. Originally Posted by flghtr65

Your lies have been repudiated, flighty. Hildebeest as Sec of State was, by regulation, directly responsible for the security of all embassy personnel including the ambassador, flighty, not the CIA.

Your lies have been repudiated, flighty. Hildebeest as Sec of State was, by regulation, directly responsible for the security of all embassy personnel including the ambassador, flighty, not the CIA. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No, I did not lie. You lied IBH. Here is the proof. The link was posted by LexusLover, who is on your side most of the time.


•The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]

https://benghazi.house.gov/NewInfo

Avoid a constitutional crisis because the 0zombie King was complicit...


Ohhh, now it make sence...

Avoid a constitutional crisis because the 0zombie King was complicit...


Ohhh, now it make sence...


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

+1

No, I did not lie. You lied IBH. Here is the proof. The link was posted by LexusLover, who is on your side most of the time.


•The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]

https://benghazi.house.gov/NewInfo Originally Posted by flghtr65

You're either lying or being incredibly stupid, flighty. You in no manner proved your previous point, flighty, nor proved that hildebeest wasn't personally responsible by regulation for the security of all embassy personnel to include the ambassador, flighty.

22 U.S. Code § 4802 - Responsibility of Secretary of State

(a) Security functions

(1) The Secretary of State shall develop and implement (in consultation with the heads of other Federal agencies having personnel or missions abroad where appropriate and within the scope of the resources made available) policies and programs, including funding levels and standards, to provide for the security of United States Government operations of a diplomatic nature and foreign government operations of a diplomatic nature in the United States. Such policies and programs shall include—

(A) protection of all United States Government personnel on official duty abroad (other than Voice of America correspondents on official assignment and those personnel under the command of a United States area military commander) and their accompanying dependents;

(B) establishment and operation of security functions at all United States Government missions abroad (other than facilities or installations subject to the control of a United States area military commander);

Your central point? What central point?
Here are your posts.


The election is completely in the bag for Hillary, barring a complete miracle.

Time to consider who will be the best candidate for 2020, and how we can hold onto the House and Senate in the meantime.

Liberals are going to be lording it over us for the rest of our lives. We can only hope our children and grandchildren can save what was once a great nation.

No way will I ever salute the flag or put my hand over my heart for a country run by Hillary Clinton. I will not recite the Pledge of Allegiance even if you put a gun to my head.

White conservative men are the new Black men now. They are going to get revenge on us boys, so get ready.
The central points of this post are you have already given up on the election, that you feel we are no longer a great nation, your "loyalty" to your country comes and goes depending on who the president is, and even if threatened with death won't say something others have died to uphold.

Which brings us to you being afraid of a role reversal and the revenge you fear is coming. I've seen several posts from you in the past days, this one included, where the central point is that you're afraid of being treated like you're black.

Why is that?

I'm not a coward and I demand you either prove it, or meet me in a duel.

Let's just see who the coward is, pussy.

That had nothing to do with your central points.

And I responded in the thread.

Which brings us to;
Ironically, you do all the same actions that you criticize, and you still fail to refute my central point about diversity/affirmative action, aka permanent reparations.

There is nothing to refute concerning your "central point"

I do all the actions I criticize?

Prove it. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I don't have to prove shit - all someone needs to do is read your posts.

You think you are clever by shucking and jiving but in reality you can't answer my points, you cannot refute them, and you think you are fooling everyone. your not, you aren't very smart, and everyone sees it.

What the fuck is with these non-reading or non-comprehending colostomy-bags?

I said I'd do it my self.

If you have so much extra time, why don't you volunteer as a big brother and help out a child you forced to be born?

Oh that's right. You don't want anything to do with them after they're born. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It is the parents responsibility to take care of their children, or they are worse than infidels. Us stopping you people from murdering a child via abortion does not create an obligation to care for the child.

I don't have any obligation to take care of anyone else's baby, though if they are mistreated the State should put them in an orphanage.