Oops. Court says Trump doesn't have the authority to set tariffs

He belongs in jail with the other felons.

Finally Wal-Mart (and co) spends the hundreds of millions to eat the tarrifs, build the plants that make what China ships, pays a living wage and it's only half as valued. Until the returns.

I like it. Will it happen? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

When they stop passing flyers to their employees on how to collect welfare?

Wallyworld is the largest company by revenue by a mile with over 2/3 rds of a TRILLION in annual revenue.



all of it is based on cheap China labor

... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

And not paying their USA employees a living wage.

... Too right, mate! ... Trump's rulings and decisions
always have Great Appeal...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Than why don't they move past the executive order stage? Does he need them as teepee for his late night shitter postings?

Who cares what he claims, Jacky? Trump is a full of shit cunt (unlike you, Jacky, I prefer to use that word in its proper vulgar context) who always blames everyone but himself for his fuck ups. The bottom line is that he tried to be slick with his say on all tariffs by using an Act that was enacted in 1977 but not for the purpose that Trump is trying to justify his Wac-a-Mole tariff game.

Trump and his MAGA cult will blame Dems when they should be blaming their idiot master and his flunkies for not finding another loophole somewhere else to let him try to be all over the place on a whim with his tariff obsession.

To be honest, I am just curious to know why it took so long for the courts to step in to alter Trump's all over the place tariff madness plan. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

Man. I bet you won't find one posting by the maggies that will point out one fuck up their Fearless Leader has made. And God Forbid they even ask for him to accept responsibility for such.

Trump is always searching for some obscure law to justify his authoritarian ways.


The executive branch is just 1 of the 3 separate, but equal branches of government.


The problem with the tariffs, some tariffs, no tariffs, tariffs in 90 days or more is that businesses
are unable to plan how to operate, and jobs are being lost in several different economic sectors. Originally Posted by VitaMan

The idiot should know from his first time in office that you want something to stick, you get it through Congress. Nope. To fat, senile and lazy to put in the work.

Looks like you missed the part where the three judges were appointed by Reagan, Obama and...drumroll please....the chief felon. Originally Posted by IAmReallyIronman

Oh you just didn't go there!

Indeed. Guess they aren't sharing that on breitbart or newmax. LOL

The judges, one appointed by President Ronald Reagan, one by President Barack Obama, and one by Trump himself, noted that the U.S. Constitution gives exclusively to Congress the power to impose tariffs. In 1977, Congress passed the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, often abbreviated as IEEPA, delegating to the president the power to adjust tariffs in times of national emergency, but Trump has used that power far beyond what the Constitution will permit. Originally Posted by TechPapi

I have been wondering if anybody has been keeping track on who appointed the judges in the various cases they have ruled on that involved anything donny has been doing. Ima sure there are a few former maggies (because they are disowned by the rabid crowd for going against fat daddy).

the cult leader doesn't like being called a TACO. It fits. He's a cunt.

How thin skinned is the man-child who occupies the Oval Office? This thin-skinned: Trump angrily lashed out at a reporter who asked him a question about his serial flip-flops on tariffs.


“Mr. President,” CNBC White House correspondent Megan Casella asked Trump, “Wall Street analysts have coined a new term called the TACO trade. They’re saying “Trump Always Chickens Out” on your tariff threats. And that’s why markets are higher this week. What’s your response to that?”

Trump bristled and raged. “Don’t ever say what you said. That’s a nasty question… To me, that’s the nastiest question.”


BHWAHAHAHAHA. What a moroon. lol Originally Posted by TechPapi

THAT'S WHERE IT CAME FROM!

If Trump would let Congress do its job and enact laws for Trump to carry out his agenda, that would be appropriate.

Instead Trump tries to carry out his authoritarian agenda by finding an obscure law that gives him the right to do it. Originally Posted by VitaMan

I think it is because he knows from the last time in office that he can't do that because <insert short coming(s) of the fat man baby here>

more lawfare of judges exceeding their very limited authority by legislating from the bench

... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

And the whinny thin skinned one ain't trying to exceed the powers of his office?!

From the Constitution of the United States of America:

Article I, Section 8 – Powers of Congress
The Congress shall have Power:

1. To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

2. To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

3. To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; Originally Posted by Tiny

Farm, you lost your audience when you used the words “Newsmax” and “experts” in the same sentence.

Great job again! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

LOL!

He lost me a long time ago.
Along with Dalai and his open post accepting lies.
And the Hueco one with his believes being done with Neilson points.
etc.

... And STILL - President Trump's tariffs STAND! ...

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

Where is the TACO at today?

When they stop passing flyers to their employees on how to collect welfare?



And not paying their USA employees a living wage.



Than why don't they move past the executive order stage? Does he need them as teepee for his late night shitter postings?



Man. I bet you won't find one posting by the maggies that will point out one fuck up their Fearless Leader has made. And God Forbid they even ask for him to accept responsibility for such.



The idiot should know from his first time in office that you want something to stick, you get it through Congress. Nope. To fat, senile and lazy to put in the work.



Oh you just didn't go there!



I have been wondering if anybody has been keeping track on who appointed the judges in the various cases they have ruled on that involved anything donny has been doing. Ima sure there are a few former maggies (because they are disowned by the rabid crowd for going against fat daddy).



THAT'S WHERE IT CAME FROM!



I think it is because he knows from the last time in office that he can't do that because <insert short coming(s) of the fat man baby here>




And the whinny thin skinned one ain't trying to exceed the powers of his office?!







LOL!

He lost me a long time ago.
Along with Dalai and his open post accepting lies.
And the Hueco one with his believes being done with Neilson points.
etc.




Where is the TACO at today? Originally Posted by Precious_b

I haven't even finished reading your comeback. Just sayin'.

Me? Come back?

Only with my favourite Providers.

Me? Come back?

Only with my favourite Providers.

Comeback again.

You can sense the frustration in his opponents.

After all of their lying, gaslighting, and deceit, the President is still standing tall. Originally Posted by Jacky S

I suppose if we expand the definition of "standing tall" to being beat like a little bitch, sure. That's your POTUS.

In the judicial system, he has the worst win rate of ANY president, even amongst the GOP. That's what being lawless and corrupt will get you.

Opinion | Why Trump Is Mad at the ‘Sleazebag’ Leonard Leo

On Thursday night, President Trump turned on one of his most important allies.
A day after a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of International Trade, which included a judge he appointed in his first term, rejected his use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to grant him expansive tariff authority, Trump posted a rambling screed on Truth Social condemning the judiciary.

He posted his rant in spite of the fact that the court’s decision was almost immediately stayed by a court of appeals while it considers the administration’s arguments. Even so, the initial ruling was too much for Trump; he had to unleash.

That’s not new. He’s been condemning judges who rule against him since before he first became president. This time, however, he went after Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society. The Federalist Society is easily the largest and most influential organization of conservative lawyers in the country (I was a member in law school), and Leo is long one of its key leaders.
Trump declared himself “so disappointed” in the Federalist Society because of its “bad advice” on judicial nominations. But he reserved his real venom for Leo, calling him a “sleazebag” and a “bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America.”

Leo helped Trump choose conservative lawyers and judges for both the judiciary and his administration. Trump’s decision in his first run for president to publish a Supreme Court short list stocked with leading lights of the Federalist Society helped him win over skeptical conservatives in 2016.

But there was a problem. The Federalist Society never capitulated to Trump. It’s a decentralized group, and its members are stubbornly independent. I’ve spoken to dozens of Federalist Society student groups, and they can vary wildly from school to school. One chapter can be reasonably Trump-friendly (but never, in my experience, fully MAGA), while another is mainly Never Trump.

more at the link

Where were the courts when Biden was circumventing federal immigration laws and allowing mass illegal immigration? thats just for starters.

Where were the courts when Biden was circumventing federal immigration laws and allowing mass illegal immigration? thats just for starters. Originally Posted by Tugg Speedman

You understand that the courts rule on lawsuits, right?

Welcome to ECCIE!

Where were the courts when Biden was circumventing federal immigration laws and allowing mass illegal immigration? thats just for starters. Originally Posted by Tugg Speedman

Newbie, or a rehash?

Comeback again. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

I'm sorry. Only good for one shot nowadays.

Find another ATF, that will change