I guess they would just need to weigh the possibility of losing revenue due to the actions of a volunteer staff member (pretty minimal, if you ask me) against the fact that the volunteer staff member is, in fact, free, now, wouldn't they?
Originally Posted by Doove
I won't critique the performance of certain mods here because I'd prefer to avoid more points...that said...you nailed it...
They are free (and that, in the eyes of ownership makes up for a heck of a lot of mis-steps...)
I've used the analogy before, but mods, here or on any message board, are like little league coaches...everyone has a beef with them...the pay sucks...and if you ask the other parents (who are complaining) if they want the job you get a million excuses but no one wants to step up.