Personal attacks - maybe we CAN do without them?

offshoredrilling's Avatar
Going out on a limb and saying that this suggests you disagree
no, some posts I may agree
no way to tell unless he points out each one and why to have a debate
rather than pointing out the whole threAD



Both? Originally Posted by Ceremony
more a good call with a bit a ball busting attack
very good, you got that one
then your saying every post after the opening post was a attack ???
ya ok Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
I don't see where I said that, but read the thread and agree or disagree. Again your opinion. FWIW osd, I've always found you a pretty likeable guy, and for that reason, I would rather not argue a point that would probably not help either one of us. Sorry
offshoredrilling's Avatar
I don't see where I said that, but read the thread and agree or disagree. Again your opinion. FWIW osd, I've always found you a pretty likeable guy, and for that reason, I would rather not argue a point that would probably not help either one of us. Sorry Originally Posted by blthzr666
well wtf, you do not like attacks but not willing to debate what a attack is
makes it hard to agree or disagree
well wtf, you do not like attacks but not willing to debate what a attack is
makes it hard to agree or disagree Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
Ok, fair enough, I will indulge you later today when I get home. But I'm not looking to debate, you can simply agree or disagree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blthzr666 View Post
Read yourself and agree to disagree
Sorry can't agree or disagree unless you make a point
other than do as I say

may I help you with the idea of debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodeomann22 View Post
That's fine, there was nothing bad in it, had to fix a duplicate thread that's all

Now back on topic, seems no one here fits the bill for what she is looking for, unless they are keeping it silent,
Quote:
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling View Post
or is that
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodeomann22
That's fine, there was nothing bad in it, had to fix a duplicate thread that's all

Now back on topic, seems no one here fits the bill for what I am looking for, unless they are keeping it silent,
attack or good call by that OSD jackass?

No attack at all, good call, well.......guess that's in the eye of the beholder
offshoredrilling's Avatar
yup
Ok osd, here you go

Trish fat smokes too much
Put on too much weight drinks too much
I pass think it'd wise to pass Originally Posted by Benfica69
Calling her fat and implying she's a drunk? Sounds like a personal slam to me.

That's very fair but I disagree and stated my reasons why I pass.
Pm me guys for more info Originally Posted by Benfica69
While this isn't a personal attack, it's an invitation to share info in private, and let's face it, he obviously doesn't have anything good to say about her, so it's way too obvious that a private personal attack is being offered.



Nope a fair opinion that was honest
Held some things back but sharing in pm
White knights u have ur opinion Originally Posted by Benfica69

See last answer.


Far from elg As u know
I will fill u in
She loves sharing personal info w clients about other clients
Not good Originally Posted by Benfica69
This is purely an attack on her integrity, and very damaging to her reputation.


You can agree or disagree. I don't care either way. I'm not going to debate it, but you asked for examples and I gave them.
And whether you like or dislike someone should not enter into the equation when you are agreeing or disagreeing. I have nothing else for you on your request
offshoredrilling's Avatar
mmmmm partly agree, maybe mostly.
he could have expressed his opinion much better

At one time trisha's red mop of hair had me thinking yes give it a try
something pm'ing with her as part of home work turned me off.
hell what turned me off could turn other on

The pic's talked about in another open forum by her turn me off also.
she started the thread. Pic's by someone I normally like his work
lets say I be more of a stick with legs and tits man if I like personalty
granted I taint no gem myself

last night I saw Legacy, Chloe and trisha at Legacy's oiled up gals fest. with a surprise I wish not to see again in oil.
to bust his balls

in public LOL
To bad this I bet will happen again. Oh well the way he is LOL who cares.

but lets talk about the girls

Legacy got the personalty I like,
Chloe almost the body. darn bolt on. But nips still awesome
Trisha did nothing for me other than seemed nice person it was nice meeting her.

If I was to pull the trigger on one, Legacy. But will most likely never happen. BCD we do not see eye to eye on almost nothing LOL. So lovingly I will bring up saran wrap and she can call me likeable scum any time she wants.

so his fair opinion as he see's it. But yes rudely stated

smoking fuck I smoke also some guys do hate that. Along with some of the gals
some gals work hard on hiding it well.
Once back on ASPD all reviews list her a non smoker
bcd she told me thank god you smoke and I lit her cig for her LOL
maybe I can get her to talk to a gal that also smokes how to hide the smell
and get her smoking clients to go along with that for the non smoking clients to not care about it


on to drinking, sharing info
I have no idea, I do not know Trisha or Benfica at all or is that much.
so in a he said she said match. Not sure if I would believe or not ether one. but would enjoy the show
but I have to think reading many ISO's. If you posted a ISO info on a gal you did not know.
And someone posted the same info, would you say Thanks for the info?

Now his white knight shot. "White knights u have ur opinion"
agree with him on that, and will add most WK's do a dis-service to the damsel they think they be saving.
Now I have a done very little WK'ing, good luck finding it even if I was not a post-whore/slut
but I think my target felt my wrath

So I will mostly agree with you
yet thank Benfica for the poorly expressed info and opinion even if I have no idea if info is true
Thanks osd, I actually enjoyed reading your response, and I can't fault most of what you said.
But getting to the root of what my problem was with this specific issue, short and sweet...
Right out of the gate, this new guys first post in the thread set me off. It was totally insulting and rude. Then he goes on to offer more of the same privately. He definitely has a problem with Trisha and chose to come to the thread with the intent to publicly trash her and that kind of behavior in my eyes is sickening. And while it's pretty obvious who I would favor given who is involved, I would do the same for others, both providers and hobbyists. White Knight because I stick up for a provider? Ok then I guess I'm one if that action defines me as one. But I would also be sickened by one of the guys being unjustly trashed as well. That's part of my makeup. If you have a huge beef with someone with the magnitude of this one, you need to do it privately, not in public and make it a trash-fest circus.
Thanks osd, I actually enjoyed reading your response, and I can't fault most of what you said.
But getting to the root of what my problem was with this specific issue, short and sweet...
Right out of the gate, this new guys first post in the thread set me off. It was totally insulting and rude. Then he goes on to offer more of the same privately. He definitely has a problem with Trisha and chose to come to the thread with the intent to publicly trash her and that kind of behavior in my eyes is sickening. And while it's pretty obvious who I would favor given who is involved, I would do the same for others, both providers and hobbyists. White Knight because I stick up for a provider? Ok then I guess I'm one if that action defines me as one. But I would also be sickened by one of the guys being unjustly trashed as well. That's part of my makeup. If you have a huge beef with someone with the magnitude of this one, you need to do it privately, not in public and make it a trash-fest circus. Originally Posted by blthzr666
But it became a PM bashing instead, what good comes out of that?

Esp given who the person potentially is, was and is completely uncalled for

And yes, osd, I too agree with your post, and actually understood most of it this time.
But it became a PM bashing instead, what good comes out of that?

Esp given who the person potentially is, was and is completely uncalled for

And yes, osd, I too agree with your post, and actually understood most of it this time. Originally Posted by rodeomann22
Oh I totally agree with that! Publicly inviting others to PM bash someone is as ignorant as bashing publicly.
Ceremony's Avatar
Good stuff, guys. Very interesting takes. Really like osd's and glad he pushed for more specifics. When I read so called wk stuff it is a bit of a turn off if taken to far. I will definitely think twice if I feel like doing the same in the future.
elghund's Avatar
Thanks osd, I actually enjoyed reading your response, and I can't fault most of what you said.
But getting to the root of what my problem was with this specific issue, short and sweet...
Right out of the gate, this new guys first post in the thread set me off. It was totally insulting and rude. Then he goes on to offer more of the same privately. He definitely has a problem with Trisha and chose to come to the thread with the intent to publicly trash her and that kind of behavior in my eyes is sickening. And while it's pretty obvious who I would favor given who is involved, I would do the same for others, both providers and hobbyists. White Knight because I stick up for a provider? Ok then I guess I'm one if that action defines me as one. But I would also be sickened by one of the guys being unjustly trashed as well. That's part of my makeup. If you have a huge beef with someone with the magnitude of this one, you need to do it privately, not in public and make it a trash-fest circus. Originally Posted by blthzr666

The reality is......that this site is called the ESCORT CLIENT Community INFORMATION Exchange......not the White Knights Protect the Hookers exchange......

That would be men trading information on providers. That would mean ALL information....good or bad.

Your opinion that only happy, good and friendly information should be allowed is censorship. Any member should be able to see the good and the bad stories.....how better to make a valued judgment?


I say that White Knighting is as valuable as Bashing.

The truth is somewhere in the middle, as usual.......

elg.......
You did a great job of distorting what I said to fit your own agenda. Your interpretation of what I said is pretty twisted. But coming from you, expected, and no loss for me. Ignore list amended again!
The reality is......that this site is called the ESCORT CLIENT Community INFORMATION Exchange......not the White Knights Protect the Hookers exchange......

That would be men trading information on providers. That would mean ALL information....good or bad.

Your opinion that only happy, good and friendly information should be allowed is censorship. Any member should be able to see the good and the bad stories.....how better to make a valued judgment?


I say that White Knighting is as valuable as Bashing.

The truth is somewhere in the middle, as usual.......


elg....... Originally Posted by elghund

your correct the truth is usually in the middle, but once a provider comes and makes any attempt to "defend" herself the usual suspects start bashing her endlessly, saying shit like you a hooker, shut your mouth, do your job, blah blah, you get the point.

the point is, he made extremely rude comments about a well reviewed provider, one that he just might have reviewed himself at some point in the past, and now all of a sudden something happens in RL and he is bringing it here, and in PM world and still bashing her.

he is bitter about something and using this board to take out personal agenda, that is NOT what this board is about, is it? I agree that the good and bad should be exchanged, as it helps us make well informed decisions as to whether or not we want to see certain ladies, however, once this gets into RL squabbles that is where a line should be drawn.

just my 2 cents, take it for what its worth