Obama vs. Perry: Who Would You Vote For?

I can no vote in EU, but this discossion now sounds like crying girls who canot get what they want. Your presidente will win once more, and Texas gobernor will lose all respeto from Americans.

Is very funny, no?

84 ethics violations during his tenur in Congress, first Speaker to ever be fined for unethical behavior, and resigned in disgrace. And let's not forget he cheated on his first two wives for America. When questioned about his hypocrisy and so-called "family values" by his first wife, his reply was, "It doesn't matter what I do, people need to hear what I have to say." Gingrich's staff once remarked about his odd behavior, "He's a sociopath, but he's our sociopath".

Is this really what it takes to sway voters these days? Originally Posted by F-Sharp

During his term as Speaker, eighty-four ethics charges were filed against him; eighty-three of them were dropped. The remaining charge concerned a 20-hour college course called "Renewing American Civilization" that Gingrich had taught through a tax-deductible foundation, Allegations of tax improprieties led to two counts "of failure to seek legal advice" and one count of "providing the committee with information which he knew or should have known was inaccurate" concerning the use of a tax exempt college course for political purposes. To avoid a full hearing, Gingrich and the House Ethics Subcommittee negotiated a sanctions agreement. Democrats accused Gingrich of violating the agreement, but it was forwarded to the House for approval.On January 21, 1997, the House voted 395 to 28 to reprimand Gingrich, including a $300,000 "cost assessment" to recoup money spent on the investigation. The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated.

In 1999, the IRS cleared the organizations connected with the courses.

Newt hardly resigned in disgrace as he had a national approval rating of 45% and enjoyed overwhelming support in his district at the time of his resignation. This to me is another example of Republicans making an attempt to keep their house in order while Democrats commit far worse misdeeds and will fight forever more to remain in power [Charlie Rangel (11 convictions) et al].

While Clinton claims the credit, it was Newt and the GOP congress who balanced the budget and reformed welfare, dragging Clinton along as he kicked and screamed. No doubt Clinton was a better politician then Newt and frequently out maneuvered him politically.

On a personal level I don't like Gingrich but he has a rich pedigree and there is little doubt in my mind that he would make a very competent president.

The less they are in DC the less harm those bastard can do....

During his term as Speaker, eighty-four ethics charges were filed against him; eighty-three of them were dropped. The remaining charge concerned a 20-hour college course called "Renewing American Civilization" that Gingrich had taught through a tax-deductible foundation, Allegations of tax improprieties led to two counts "of failure to seek legal advice" and one count of "providing the committee with information which he knew or should have known was inaccurate" concerning the use of a tax exempt college course for political purposes. To avoid a full hearing, Gingrich and the House Ethics Subcommittee negotiated a sanctions agreement. Democrats accused Gingrich of violating the agreement, but it was forwarded to the House for approval.On January 21, 1997, the House voted 395 to 28 to reprimand Gingrich, including a $300,000 "cost assessment" to recoup money spent on the investigation. The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated.

In 1999, the IRS cleared the organizations connected with the courses.

Newt hardly resigned in disgrace as he had a national approval rating of 45% and enjoyed overwhelming support in his district at the time of his resignation. This to me is another example of Republicans making an attempt to keep their house in order while Democrats commit far worse misdeeds and will fight forever more to remain in power [Charlie Rangel (11 convictions) et al].

While Clinton claims the credit, it was Newt and the GOP congress who balanced the budget and reformed welfare, dragging Clinton along as he kicked and screamed. No doubt Clinton was a better politician then Newt and frequently out maneuvered him politically.

On a personal level I don't like Gingrich but he has a rich pedigree and there is little doubt in my mind that he would make a very competent president. Originally Posted by Billy_Saul

Newt likes to talk, and uses the election to stay in the public eye for business reasons, but he has no organization in any of the primary states and therefore doesn't really intend to do anything. He's just using the debates as a forum to gin up more clients for his consulting business.

He keeps careening from one ethical question to another even though he's never really been squarely nailed on anything.

Perhaps the latest is the 300k he took from FannieMae, which he falsely claims was for 'advice as a historian on their lending criteria.' It was of course nothing of the kind as he has nothing to offer there; it was for political influence.

I actually sat through one of his "classes" on "civilization." He fancies himself a scholar [where's the Phd?] but he only referenced Alvin Toffler in for every argument he made. Alvin Toffler?

Newt likes to talk, and uses the election to stay in the public eye for business reasons, but he has no organization in any of the primary states and therefore doesn't really intend to do anything. He's just using the debates as a forum to gin up more clients for his consulting business.

He keeps careening from one ethical question to another even though he's never really been squarely nailed on anything.

Perhaps the latest is the 300k he took from FannieMae, Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

I would attribute Newt's appearance as a candidate originally as more of a ploy to promote his then current and many books. Newt has actually received upwards of $1.6M from Fannie and Freddie Mac 99-08.

If there were no such thing as teleprompters do you think Obama would have been elected????

If there were no such thing as teleprompters do you think Obama would have been elected???? Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

If you are asking me, any Democrat would have been elected over John McCain in Nov.2008, teleprompter or not.

Alvin Toffler? Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/au...n_toffler.html

My favorite:

The illiterate of the future will not be the person who cannot read. It will be the person who does not know how to learn.

If there were no such thing as teleprompters do you think Obama would have been elected???? Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

I have always promoted the fact that there is no such thing as a stupid question. Perhaps it is time for me to rethink my position!

I think its funny how the socialist love to get involved with the Republican selection process.

Whichever , candidate is selected. I will vote for him or her as long as we get that Nazi SOB out. Originally Posted by harkontume

I'll tell you what's funny...watching your election process! First, it was Batshit Bachmann, until you found out just how Batshit she really is. Then it was Romney, that is until that dipshit illiterate Perry decided to run. Then you actually heard him speak in public and ran the other direction. Then it was Cain, that is until you figured out he was little more than a serial rapist in a nice suit, and now you're on to Newt. Once Newt's skeletons are out of the closet (I say skeletons, but all you'll need is a quick trip through memory lane along with a swift kick in the ass) to remember just how morally bankrupt he truly is, you'll be right back to Romney. At least until you find out how Mormons view other religions, and how ultimately, as a Mormon, Romney's first responsibility is to Thomas Monson first, and everyone and everything else second. Then you'll all just stay home and sit this one out.

"10 And he said unto me: Behold there are save atwo churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the bother is the church of the cdevil; wherefore, dwhoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the ewhore of all the earth."

http://lds.org/scriptures/bofm/1-ne/14?lang=eng

Fact is, you folks dont have a clue what you want, or have any idea what you stand for unless it comes from Fox News and their candidate flavor of the week. That's why you're ultimately going to lose this election and us "socialists" will have to listen to you bitch and complain about the "Nazi SOB" for another four years.

Fact is, you folks dont have a clue what you want, or have any idea what you stand for unless it comes from Fox News and their candidate flavor of the week. That's why you're ultimately going to lose this election and us "socialists" will have to listen to you bitch and complain about the "Nazi SOB" for another four years. Originally Posted by F-Sharp

+1

Keep watching! LOL!

If you are asking me, any Democrat would have been elected over John McCain in Nov.2008, teleprompter or not. Originally Posted by Billy_Saul

And you're not even mentioning his running mate. Put the two together and you have match made in Hell. Republicans in 2008 was the Perfect Storm.

I don't trust any news media today they all have an agenda to make us not think for ourselves... By the remarks on this board it looks like their plan is working...

I don't trust any news media today they all have an agenda to make us not think for ourselves... By the remarks on this board it looks like their plan is working... Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

You illustrate that as well as anyone. Can you tell us who you're for? Please don't give an "anybody but Obama" answer - give an actual answer. Who would your preference be for president?