Attention New Ladies or Ladies that remember when they were new and someone offered to help them get verified.....

She posted this statement on 12/20/13.......

Serious about getting verified so after session once reviewed 30% off

That clearly demonstrates that she is still looking for VP status.

Her first review posted on 12/27/13....seven days later

A comment is posted by a fucktard on the 25th that indicates she had VP on that date........that leaves a 4 day window.

Let's assume for a moment that the following worst case scenario is true........

1. supamates is iamsummer's pimp

2. iamsummer tried to get JJ to vouch for her as an "indy"

3. JJ wanted to get a freebie from a newbie provider stumbling through the easy process to get verified status.

4. The provider who JJ reached out to wouldn't give a vouch for the whore. Because, she knew iamsummer had a pimp.

5. When they were face to face JJ told iamsummer that he was expecting a freebie.

6. iamsummer couldn't give JJ a freebie. Because, her pimp would have whipped her ass.

7. iamsummer used JJ's fuck up to go over his head in order to get verified via a different modtard.

8. There was a conversation between JJ and admin that came down to a "he said/she said"......or there wasn't.

9. admin gave the whore her VP status as a consideration.

...........again assuming all the above is true..........who gets hung first........the pimp, the whore or the modtard?

Let's assume for a moment that the following worst case scenario is true........

1. supamates is iamsummer's pimp

2. iamsummer tried to get JJ to vouch for her as an "indy"

3. JJ wanted to get a freebie from a newbie provider stumbling through the easy process to get verified status.

4. The provider who JJ reached out to wouldn't give a vouch for the whore. Because, she knew iamsummer had a pimp.

5. When they were face to face JJ told iamsummer that he was expecting a freebie.

6. iamsummer couldn't give JJ a freebie. Because, her pimp would have whipped her ass.

7. iamsummer used JJ's fuck up to go over his head in order to get verified via a different modtard.

8. There was a conversation between JJ and admin that came down to a "he said/she said"......or there wasn't.

9. admin gave the whore her VP status as a consideration.

...........again assuming all the above is true..........who gets hung first........the pimp, the whore or the modtard? Originally Posted by dearhunter

LOL.... None..... They don't let us hand the admins..... I don't think ASKING for freebies and being told NO is enough to hang JJ...... Without Pimps we have less pussy.... and as provider's go summer is cute and has nothing but positive reviews.... Seems like we should have been enjoying her a lot sooner.

You should start Modding here DearHunter. I know it is not your area but you provide more insight and reason than the local Mods.

Fuck that........hang me

Fuck that........hang me Originally Posted by dearhunter

Fuck that........hang me Originally Posted by dearhunter

I'd rather blow you...

I think your scenario is about as likely as we will get barring more info...

(...)

There has to be more to the story of how she got to that point.

If a 2nd lady were to have experienced the same thing now.... it would not bode well at all...

What say you Ladies of ECCIE? Anyone out there that has experienced JJ soliciting a free session that is willing to step up here publicly?

Or any other member? Step up and tell your story....

Originally Posted by Whispers

First, it's been a few days since whispers inquired if other ladies had similar experiences with JJ. The lack of any other provider stepping up publicly isn't dispositive, but if anyone else has had any such experience....

Second, I'm having difficulty reconciling both stories... We as hobbyists are never supposed to discuss $, especially in a providers presence. I can see how JJ may have been trying to educate her... At this point, they have been total strangers. Not sure how he would have found out her donation otherwise, though.... Classic chicken or the egg question? Like whispers said, if the topic of $ comes up after seemingly agreed upon, I'm out.

She didn't have a showcase to post services and availability... But they had communicated? Did he assume from some part of the conversation that she was on board with a quid pro quo to expedite verification? This isn't the first time we've seen new providers post in welcome thread a discount for verification or for reviews... A provider saying out loud (as she admits) "no money no a$$" would result in me walking out... But I'd have known the donation up front....

Just some thoughts...

Respectfully and humbly I'd like to add #10 & 11 to Deerhunters list,

10. the meltdown comes about because in the "Supamates Undercover" thread post #32, She specifically shouts for a MOD to "DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT" and help her out. Back her up that she is NOT Supamates nor has a Pimp. Instead of riding to the rescue, JJ misses or ignores the clue and closes the thread leaving the confusion or doubt frozen in place.

11. Whispers shows up with his shit stirring fishing expedition 'err thread, post or whatever and since now she feels hurt and BETRAYED she takes the opportunity to take the knife JJ put in her back and bury it into JJ's back for revenge.

Since this is all speculation, I'll add that some providers don't consider themselves to have pimps because the guy is their "boyfriend". They rationalize he watches out and adds "safety" into the situation. He's not a pimp since they "share" living expenses and he's the "only" guy they allow bb. Down the road they suddenly show up preggers? But that's a thread for later.

I think it's pretty obvious she has a pimp but who gives a flying fuck. All I am seeing is 300/H (for time and companionship only of course) on an unproven provider that looks like the average bud light drinking, spurs watching , Latina here in San Antonio. I'll pass.

In reference to the title and other information/concerns in this thread about the verification process, I ask this: a new provider, unverified, no reviews, signs up for an acct. and a Mod contacts her offering to get her VP status. They meet but NO actual session takes place- no BCD but then the MOD verifies her anyway.

If this scenario also belongs in this thread for what is being discussed here then yes, the Mod in question mayhaps be thrown under that metaphoric bus.

KKA

It doesn't matter whether JJ is guilty of poor judgment or abuse of some perceived power.

If you are looking for someone to hang in all of this, you miss the value in this discussion.

The value is in your ability as a city forum to openly question and offer your opinions on what is happening around you. It is ok to disagree and call each other on bullshit.

When modtards attempt to moderate that discussion, the domino effect is beyond the visible and obvious.

Here is irony for you........JJ is for the free exchange of information in your city forum..........he stays out of the way and allows himself (maybe deserved/maybe undeserved) to be crucified........and some bitches around here still are not happy.

I would say that if all of it is true, he is the best modtard you could possibly have. You know what he is capable of, and will always be on your guard (as you should be) against him over reaching in his capacity as a modtard.

Bitches that praise modtards crack me up........they pay for pussy just like you do........well, most of them anyway.

You should view every retard with a healthy dose of skepticism..........including Whispers......heh

Whispers in another thread you referenced a lady being raped by a by someone here on eccie and 3 other ladies with similar stories about getting verified. Was it a San Antonio moderator or just a hobbiest?

I am curious as heck as to wether it was it JJ? Are women accusing him of rape or attempted rape?

Almost 48 hours has JJ been seen on the board? Figured he'd be like a pit bull on a can of spam by now!

Hiker, the rape situation isn't directed at JJ.