Colombia

https://www.yahoo.com/news/truth-dep...170215622.html

And hello...

https://www.wbaltv.com/article/coffe...ombia/63593320

https://www.euronews.com/business/20...-coffee-prices Originally Posted by HDGristle

Every person on the plane to Colombia was a criminal if they entered the US illegally.

Every person on the plane to Colombia was a criminal if they entered the US illegally. Originally Posted by Green_Mountain

How does that cute zoomer chick Trump put on the press podium know this but a bunch of grown men don’t?

How does that cute zoomer chick Trump put on the press podium know this but a bunch of grown men don’t? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

depends if you mean grown men physically or mentally..........

Gristle thinks when ICE does a raid and scoops up "bonus" illegals in addition to the bad hombres they're seeking, they should just release the bonus hombres and not deport them too.

Nah, it's just that some folks fibbed about who was on the plane and the prioritization we've discussed in the past isn't in play.

Proves me right. Again.

The priorities are WORST FIRST. If you scoop up other illegals in the process, they go too.

Prioritization is very much in play.

Proves you wrong. Again.

Show us the charge sheets for those Colombians. We can point to folks on that plane who entered the U.S. on 1/20/25. They weren't scooped up as part of interior enforcement targeting bad hombres. I can also account for non-hombres

Thanks for playing, Lusty. I do love the energy but you're 11 runs down and I get the final at bats.

i would invest in alot of parachutes......problem solved.... Originally Posted by chizzy

That's where Pinochet saved money.

Show us the charge sheets for those Colombians.

Still looking for those "charge sheets"? Daayyuum. This must be the 5th time you've asked for them in this thread. I thought you were a sharp guy who knows how to google and "connect the dots". My bad.


We can point to folks on that plane who entered the U.S. illegally on 1/20/25.

FTFY. And yes, it did need fixing.


Thanks for playing, Lusty. I do love the energy but you're 11 runs ahead and I get the final at bats. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Keep up your nit-picking, Gristle. And good luck in your final at-bat.

Still waiting for you to produce. We both know why you can't.

And we can currently account for 63 on the flights who had no charges at all

I found the details of the passengers on the flight back to Colombia.

100% illegal.

No need to thank me.

I recall. You watched FOX but couldn't name any charges

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2688591.html

Still waiting for you to produce. We both know why you can't. Originally Posted by HDGristle

Why are you asking me to do the work you refuse to do? Isn't that what you say the undocumented immigrants are here for? Ask one of them to google it for you.

And we can currently account for 63 on the flights who had no charges at all, including some expulsions Originally Posted by HDGristle

Look up the word "expulsion". So they were expelled for... no reason? Uh... how does that work, Gristle?

Not only were they expelled, they were given a free ride home. And you have a problem wid dat? Why? Should we have demanded reimbursement from them?

You're confused again.

For example, inadmissability by itself isn't criminal. Showing up at a POE to apply for asylum isn't criminal, either.

Come back after you've refreshed on the differences between expulsions and deportations. Including expulsions where the migrant is temporarily in DHS custody until return transportation is arranged because they can't be expelled to Mexico.

Or expulsions where a migrant is removed for safety reasons, like during COVID. Hence, the "emergency" for the "invasion" to justify further asylum suspension and to broaden expulsions and deportability by suspending the normal rules.

I've cautioned you boys about absolutes and you continue to disappoint.

The criminality argument is a red herring. As is the broad-brush illegal presence argument. There's also some laws on the books that are relevant.

I ask you to find the charge sheets because you need to see for yourself that what you're saying isn't factual. I can check your biases all day long, but only you can recognize you're wrong about who all was on those flights and that your narrative requires some better focus and tuning.

I recall. You watched FOX but couldn't name any charges

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2688591.html Originally Posted by HDGristle

I did watch Fox and specific violent charges were 100% verbalized.