Respectful Objectification

As I understand it, eccie is utilized just as much by providers beyond just being an advertising tool, but also a screening thing too. I'm not saying that any amount of screening, reviews, post counts, etc, will keep you 100% safe but it lessens your chances of dealing with external dangers associated with strip clubs, BP or StreetWalking right?

Sounds like a pissed off hooker with no business. Sorry lady but just based on your photos on your showcase and what they "imply" LE could make many assumptions about you and jam you up. You obviously have NOTHING else to do. You also sound as if you are jaded and have anger issues with men--and if you feel its wrong to use sexuality in order to make money, get promoted, or even a job, ya need to step back and realize your a fucking hooker! A hypocritical one at that. Ya know lady, I have awesome tits, and a very pretty face, nice curves, educated, and smart to boot. Your damn right Ill use every bit of it to get my piece of the pie, in the hobby and in RL! Anyone woman who says she never has is a LIAR!! We learn this when we are young, making sweet eyes for attention and blowing kisses.

So if providers have reviews that gets them the biz, so be it. Im beginning to think you got busted and angry your the only one that went down, at least according to a description you gave. If that is the case, thats your problem, not anyone elses. If so then maybe you shoulda called your lawyer hooker friend to defend you in court. Sure she has reviews out there if she is making what you claim and would know the legality of it all.

I think Walmart takes online applications, just sayn... Originally Posted by kymberlane

I'll share my popcorn and beer with you, and other stuff if you like.

Cool had to ask.. this room is heated.. i just started using the boards more last month.. are these conversations always.. jab. jab.. ?

I was talking about the OP. Originally Posted by CarolinaGent

Wow.?!?!
She's just trying to see how to try to remain anonymous as possible.. Originally Posted by Tylus_amore

Starting this thread was sure the wrong way to achieve that goal, everyone knows her name now. Good marketing (or bad) on her part is much more likely, I would say.

There is another place that has no review or client posting board.
I think it's called Back Page or something. I don't think anyone ever
runs into any hassles using it.

Can I have some beer with my popcorn. Originally Posted by bojulay

Posting taint would be a good choice right now.

Somebody had to say it!!

I'll share my popcorn and beer with you, and other stuff if you like. Originally Posted by bojulay

Wow.?!?!
She's just trying to see how to try to remain anonymous as possible.. Everyone that is in the hobby wants some type of protection... I mean how can we go from calling Women providers to "when you decided to become a hooker"... Without providers the hobby wouldn't exists at all.

Just because someone expresses concern about the hobby doesn't mean she is trying to ruin everyone's fun.....
A lot of my guys will not leave reviews because the fact that they know LE are known to be present Furthermore, they do not wish to get caught up in anything illegal..

It's funny how we don't leave a paper trail when paying for appointments in cash but all of the information about the session is posted online forever......
That is something to be concerned about. Anyone who says they don't care are probably lying..

I think that we should have reviews and I think that providers should be verified.. however, I don't think that its fair to badger someone for being concerned..
if the hobbyist didn't care how come a lot of people have in their signatures of everything on here being a fantasy.... Originally Posted by Tylus_amore

Good post...

Wow.?!?!
She's just trying to see how to try to remain anonymous as possible.. Everyone that is in the hobby wants some type of protection... I mean how can we go from calling Women providers to "when you decided to become a hooker"... Without providers the hobby wouldn't exists at all.

Just because someone expresses concern about the hobby doesn't mean she is trying to ruin everyone's fun.....
A lot of my guys will not leave reviews because the fact that they know LE are known to be present Furthermore, they do not wish to get caught up in anything illegal..

It's funny how we don't leave a paper trail when paying for appointments in cash but all of the information about the session is posted online forever......
That is something to be concerned about. Anyone who says they don't care are probably lying..

I think that we should have reviews and I think that providers should be verified.. however, I don't think that its fair to badger someone for being concerned..
if the hobbyist didn't care how come a lot of people have in their signatures of everything on here being a fantasy.... Originally Posted by Tylus_amore

This site, is what it is....and in majority of cases a combo of marketing and info sharing is really the game.

Everyone should know that going in...if you're not comfortable with it...don't be part of this site.

Granted there is a lot of drama, but if you know how to play the game...it really isn't that hard to control it, rather than have you control by the process.

We are all suppose to be adults...right

oh seriously.... I got it... Good move... Maybe...

Starting this thread was sure the wrong way to achieve that goal, everyone knows her name now. Good marketing (or bad) on her part is much more likely, I would say. Originally Posted by camouflage

I don't think reviews should be labeled as ... talibanish... but whats wrong with being concerned... at the end of the day no one wants to get caught... with their pants down... or panties off.. lol.. Originally Posted by Tylus_amore

It is not the reviews that are talibanish. It is the fact that police pursue the women who are reviewed, and not the men who are making the reviews. Goes back to Eve in the garden of Eden. It was all her fault that Adam bit the apple. They still cut the clitorises out of women in some cultures because the men are afraid their wives might be unfaithful. Rendering them undesirable, as anything but breed stock, is the chosen solution. The same thread, to sacrifice the women, because men are weak and cannot help themselves, is the issue that I am addressing.

No, the police target where there is an easy bust.

They presume you are guilty, based on association with those who are blatantly breaking the law, and arrest you. Then it is up to you to prove you are not, which eats up your profits. After spending three days in jail, getting kicked in the head, coming out with a scar on your face, and paying for a lawyer, you could have made more money working at a regular job and having sex with the boss in order to get a raise... The incentive to work as an escort is quickly diminished when factoring in the heightened risk, which makes me wonder is there is a subconscious drive to put the women out of business on the part of reviewers, or whether erectile function is simply and naturally dependent upon man's sense of entitlement to boast about his exploitations. Hence my use of the term "talibanish"... if the former. Originally Posted by Deva Divine

Let us not beat around the proverbial bush here. It all boils down to business. Period. The allusions of pay for time only goes only so far. The review process is to enlighten other like minded males of quality (or non quality) of services rendered. This business has implied risks no doubt. You should know about them going into it. The old saying of "not if but when" comes to mind about those risks. Busts happen. Just should have factored that in when you studied the implied risk factors. And yes justice does not come cheap. The system is modeled to make money after all. Be it in fines and court costs or bail and legal fees. Either way expect to be out a minimum of a couple grand. Your failure to factor this in should not be blamed on the gents who willingly give you business and pay your bills. I'd hazard a guess to say you a bit bitter and it is in the end entirely your own fault.

Chick is crazy..don't entertain her insanity any longer...please...

It is not the reviews that are talibanish. It is the fact that police pursue the women who are reviewed, and not the men who are making the reviews. Goes back to Eve in the garden of Eden. It was all her fault that Adam bit the apple. They still cut the clitorises out of women in some cultures because the men are afraid their wives might be unfaithful. Rendering them undesirable, as anything but breed stock, is the chosen solution. The same thread, to sacrifice the women, because men are weak and cannot help themselves, is the issue that I am addressing. Originally Posted by Deva Divine

What you seem to fail to understand is this. Cops by nature are inherently lazy. Plus they seem to not like placing themselves in "risky" situations if it can be avoided. So bust an easy target who places ads on BP or some other venue where they know they won't risk having a firearm pulled on them and risk getting shot at. Or have someone fight them and risk having their lazy ass kicked and living down the jokes about it passing around the station house. The women are just easy targets nothing more nothing less. The men are hard to find as we sure don't go around posting pictures of ourselves in our reviews and sure the hell don't place ads...