verified just Feels better

I have had nothing but good from BP
Couple bad ones were from VP here that I met from BP.

Monet comes to mind as a bad one. She stacked guys out in the parking lot like cord wood

I would love to see a demonstration of that. Originally Posted by jackfengshui

Hey on aspd one of my personas was POD. I had awesome reviews.

Most of us know that it is not an endorsement and there are no guarantees, but statistics have shown that, in general, there are better odds of being satisfied with a VP than a BP provider. Originally Posted by jackfengshui

Are there statistics? Or is this a generalization?

I don't think enough know. I read just moments ago a post where a moderator advised a newbie that STDs are relatively unlikely amongst VPs compared with a BP girl. I think advice that would encourage letting your guard down with any SP is questionable.

I like this site, but I am not going to pretend the verification process is more than it is.

I would love to see a demonstration of that. Originally Posted by jackfengshui

I'd have to lie, and have someone lie for me, that activity occurred, which I am not going to do. Nor am I going to tranny up and kneel.

I have been assuming, but do not know, that verification entails checking a little info and that a date ocurred. Bingo, she's in. No one has corrected me on this, but I'd love to learn if I'm off.

Are there statistics? Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

It is a non-scientific sample, but these are the most recent reviews with a "No" recommendation. There is just one commonality.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=765672
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=760320
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=759502
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=737427
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=754768
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=685566
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=753685

Most of us know that it is not an endorsement and there are no guarantees, but statistics have shown that, in general, there are better odds of being satisfied with a VP than a BP provider. Originally Posted by jackfengshui

Are there statistics? Or is this a generalization?

I don't think enough know. I read just moments ago a post where a moderator advised a newbie that STDs are relatively unlikely amongst VPs compared with a BP girl. I think advice that would encourage letting your guard down with any SP is questionable. Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

Well there's a research project for any of you guys still in college. I've certainly had better luck with VP's. Others have had fine luck with BP. Ultimately the only thing that matters is that you find what you're looking for. As far as the likelihood of STD's, who knows? My guess is it's more likely with BP gals. I only say this because I've encountered BP gals who didn't practice good hygiene. That has never been an issue with VP gals.

but statistics have shown Originally Posted by jackfengshui

It is a non-scientific sample Originally Posted by jackfengshui

You cannot back up the former statement with the latter sample. I truly believe you recognize that.

Your general argument isn't wrong either, but unless someone wants to put some convincing stats behind it, I will continue to believe there is danger in taking it for granted.

Jack, even though this may sound like it, I am not calling you out...

One of the first things you told me when we met was that:

Although I was already a VP here, you still waited to see how things worked out.

You are a smart man IMO.

So, because of your words...

I feel this way on the topic:

VP's are a better chance, because they have most likely started on a place like bp and did well enough to eventually last long enough to discover this site to become verified, plus it can show, regardless of starting on bp or not, it is a good sign that perhaps they care about their biz to become verified on a site like this.

However, where your words come into play is that...

Sure there is a better chance already with a VP, BUT really one can also watch like you did with me, and see if a bp is well reviewed and outlasts without ever joining this site.

It makes sense that any new bp or vp is potentially an equal risk..yet in contradiction to that, I do feel that there is better odds with a vp. The first toft is over, doesn't that make a huge difference?

Guys go to Bp because there is no pussy like new pussy and when someone finds a new girl who is good everyone jumps for example the new flavor has been "Alyssa"

Well said Frankie.

There is a difference, I feel it is small and over-stated at times.

WE have the power to widen the gap.

Guys go to Bp because there is no pussy like new pussy and when someone finds a new girl who is good everyone jumps for example the new flavor has been "Alyssa" Originally Posted by Seanross26

And hence the long discussion, because Jack does not do that. He is a very patient man even when it comes to vps. So in a weird way I feel like I am calling him out, but I agree with him too

I am not sure if Jack would see a bp if she had a terrific reputation for long enough? That is an interesting question...Jack?!

It is a non-scientific sample, but these are the most recent reviews with a "No" recommendation. There is just one commonality.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=765672
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=760320
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=759502
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=737427
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=754768
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=685566
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=753685 Originally Posted by jackfengshui

statistics ya right

Where does the guy mmmm make that guys that did yes reviews then got blacklisted, fit in them there statistics???

I see no review from the guy that got poisoned. errrr girl, you say you just did a duo with another girl ahhhhh pass. I don't want something that was placed to kill another. IJS

How many of them yes's would have been no if they knew blackmail was coming after the review.

I see no review from the guy that got his car stolen. Car did not go far. A upset Hobbyist used the other Hobbyist car to run into providers car. Then left it there.

Then the PT dates where a the one supplying the PT put a little extra other PT in the PT given to the other. To take advantage of the other.

How many of the yes's would even be, if it was known she was under age.

I could go on with what is not in the statistics of crap form eccie Upset VP providers and PA guys.
But I got a new Pseudo thread on my mind I want ta post latter.

I could go on with what is not in the statistics of crap form eccie Upset VP providers and PA guys.
But I got a new Pseudo thread on my mind I want ta post latter. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

I guess you think guys are making bogus reviews of VP gals. That may be true. But the same can be said of some of the BP reviews. Didn't have a clue as to what you are talking about in the rest of that post.

I guess you think guys are making bogus reviews of VP gals. That may be true. But the same can be said of some of the BP reviews. Originally Posted by cowboy8055

yup, and I miss Paul Harvey radio show. For the real ROS.

Didn't have a clue as to what you are talking about in the rest of that post. Originally Posted by cowboy8055

Of coarse not. If I posted in more detail, the post would be all red edit or deleted by now. And rightfully so if to stay within the rules of the board. Plus no one would tell me this crap anymore.

You cannot back up the former statement with the latter sample. I truly believe you recognize that. Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

When I post in ECCIE and use the word "statistics", I hope I am allowed to mean "a casual recollection by a senior citizen of the frequency of different review recommendations" - and that I won't be held to the standards and rigor of a scientific paper.