What “beliefs” are you talking about? (I’m assuming this comment was directed at me) You actually think the baby would rather be dead? Call me crazy, but I think you’d be hard pressed to find many people, other than maybe a few in mental institutions, who wouldn’t prefer being alive. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeIt is not a baby...it is an embryo.
I’ll ask again, what beliefs? Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
So strange. How many times have you mentioned the ex President's name....in capital letters ? You are obsessed with a strange obsession.
And you still don't get it about individual rights. You must still be reading the list you provided about gun registration that was completely off topic. You did not understand what the discussion was about.
Stay in your lane with the BiBas, and provide a list of threads and posts with the word "pissant".
Sparky Anderson is turning over in his grave. Originally Posted by VitaMan
Look in the mirror and ask the same question to yourself. Then you might get an idea what this is about.
Then ask yourself if you are ready to impose your beliefs on others.
If the answer is "Yes", then you can be introduced to some Muslim terrorists who would like to impose their beliefs on you. Originally Posted by VitaMan
It is not a baby...it is an embryo.I can agree with this to a certain extent (not the retarded part obviously). IMO the Texas bill does a good job delineating the difference between embryo and baby, defining it as a baby when there’s a determinable heartbeat. That’s how we determine dead, makes perfect sense that it would also determine alive.
Jesus...nobody is for killing babies...at least not until we find out if they're potential Trump lovers!Originally Posted by WTF
Your beliefs being imposed on others. Leave them alone to create their own heaven or hell. Their lives don't concern you. Originally Posted by VitaMan
I can agree with this to a certain extent (not the retarded part obviously). IMO the Texas bill does a good job delineating the difference between embryo and baby, defining it as a baby when there’s a determinable heartbeat. That’s how we determine dead, makes perfect sense that it would also determine alive. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeIt’s alive from the time it’s conceived. However that doesn’t make it viable. Which is when I would consider it a “baby”. Just because it has a heartbeat doesn’t really imply anything except that in the formation process a heart has developed. What’s not developed are a whole lot of other organs necessary for it survive with even the most advanced equipment at our disposal. Heartbeat doesn’t denote viability.
It’s alive from the time it’s conceived. However that doesn’t make it viable. Which is when I would consider it a “baby”. Just because it has a heartbeat doesn’t really imply anything except that in the formation process a heart has developed. What’s not developed are a whole lot of other organs necessary for it survive with even the most advanced equipment at our disposal. Heartbeat doesn’t denote viability. Originally Posted by NoirMan
I can agree with this to a certain extent (not the retarded part obviously). IMO the Texas bill does a good job delineating the difference between embryo and baby, defining it as a baby when there’s a determinable heartbeat. That’s how we determine dead, makes perfect sense that it would also determine alive. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Here you finally expressed your beliefs. All people do not agree with you. So you want to impose and enforce your beliefs on them with laws ? Originally Posted by VitaMan