Pete Hegseth Needs to Go. Now.

rooster's Avatar
....The was a reason the name went from "War" to "Defense".

President of Peace, right?

Hegseth projects an image of "war" rather than peace and is driving the country backwards. He needs to go. Originally Posted by Turner2099
And...we come full circle! This is a great closing argument. It would be a mic drop were it not for brainless, unquestioning Trump loyalty....

(I'm sure we aren't done)

.
Precious_b's Avatar
Rage? LOL. I’m in complete agreement with blowing smugglers to smitherines. Giddy ≠ rage. The only rage is from you apologists who apparently care more about foreign cartels, who have no constitutional rights, especially in international waters, than Americans. Fuck em. They could be drawn and quartered in Times Square on pay per view for all I care. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
So, can you please show us the evidence that each and every one of the vessels destroyed by the military had the contraban (sp) on it that was claimed?

Horse truth. You’re so butthurt that Trump is the President you’d defend those responsible for thousands of American deaths. Truly pathetic. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
The Big Cheato has anything but defended the thousands of americans who have died. I would bet you he is responsible for more than a few deaths from shifting billions of dollars that went to drug treatment programs and put them to the military.

Again i'll ask you non-fiscal conservative maggies: what is cheaper, prevention or this sick use of the military in the war on drugs? It is tens of millions of dollars a day to keep up the operation. How many people would just one days cost be able to treat in this country?

I would say the answer is common sense but maggies are in a severe deficit of having such.

And...we come full circle! This is a great closing argument. It would be a mic drop were it not for brainless, unquestioning Trump loyalty....

(I'm sure we aren't done)

. Originally Posted by rooster
Maggies don't care they are ruining this country on many fronts. And give no shits that we are the laughing stock of the world.
Jacuzzme's Avatar
You figure they’re bombing guys out for a pleasure cruise or looking to hook red snapper? That’s ridiculous. It’s not Trump or Hegseth flipping a coin over who gets droned, that’s what satellites and human sources are for. The chance that SIGINT is wrong is minuscule. I’ll go with their assessment over a bunch of whining, blue haired, septum pierced apologists.

And when did peace through strength become outdated? FAFO doctrine has only prevented nuclear innihilation for pushing a century, a pretty good track record. The military is there to kill people and destroy property, war is the only look they’ve got. Peace is for the state department, the armed forces are for when they fail.
rooster's Avatar
You figure they’re bombing guys out for a pleasure cruise or looking to hook red snapper? That’s ridiculous. It’s not Trump or Hegseth flipping a coin over who gets droned, that’s what satellites and human sources are for. The chance that SIGINT is wrong is minuscule. I’ll go with their assessment over a bunch of whining, blue haired, septum pierced apologists.

And when did peace through strength become outdated? FAFO doctrine has only prevented nuclear innihilation for pushing a century, a pretty good track record. The military is there to kill people and destroy property, war is the only look they’ve got. Peace is for the state department, the armed forces are for when they fail. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
You just make the same tired arguments over and over. You want them to do this stuff, plain and simple. Fine. We get it.

But I ask this question of all of MAGA, not just you:

When did respecting human rights become outdated?

And don't give me a bunch of what-about-ism. I don't need to hear about Obama's drone strikes or Kennedy's illegal bombings. I was against all of that too.

But MAGA...you celebrate this stuff. Absolutely fucking celebrate it.

It will be yet another thing that leads to your massive fall. Epic.

.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
FAFO isn’t a doctrine. It’s terrorism.

The fall of MAGA has been in progress since January of last year.
MAGA is endangered feces.

Just wait!
Jacuzzme's Avatar
You just make the same tired arguments over and over. You want them to do this stuff, plain and simple. Fine. We get it.

But I ask this question of all of MAGA, not just you:

When did respecting human rights become outdated?

And don't give me a bunch of what-about-ism. I don't need to hear about Obama's drone strikes or Kennedy's illegal bombings. I was against all of that too.

But MAGA...you celebrate this stuff. Absolutely fucking celebrate it.

It will be yet another thing that leads to your massive fall. Epic.

. Originally Posted by rooster
Celebrating blowing up cartels? Hell yeah. The important question is why aren’t you.

You just make the same tired arguments over and over.
Living in a house lacking mirrors, I presume.
rooster's Avatar
Celebrating blowing up cartels? Hell yeah. The important question is why aren’t you.... Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Because I respect human rights on a higher level.

We've both made our points multiple times. Give it a rest. You'll have lots more opportunity elsewhere to express your unquestioning fealty to this madness. We'll talk soon.

.
Precious_b's Avatar
You figure they’re bombing guys out for a pleasure cruise or looking to hook red snapper? That’s ridiculous. It’s not Trump or Hegseth flipping a coin over who gets droned, that’s what satellites and human sources are for. The chance that SIGINT is wrong is minuscule. I’ll go with their assessment over a bunch of whining, blue haired, septum pierced apologists.

And when did peace through strength become outdated? FAFO doctrine has only prevented nuclear innihilation for pushing a century, a pretty good track record. The military is there to kill people and destroy property, war is the only look they’ve got. Peace is for the state department, the armed forces are for when they fail. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
What supporting evidence do you have for that?

You just make the same tired arguments over and over. You want them to do this stuff, plain and simple. Fine. We get it.

But I ask this question of all of MAGA, not just you:

When did respecting human rights become outdated?

And don't give me a bunch of what-about-ism. I don't need to hear about Obama's drone strikes or Kennedy's illegal bombings. I was against all of that too.

But MAGA...you celebrate this stuff. Absolutely fucking celebrate it.

It will be yet another thing that leads to your massive fall. Epic.

. Originally Posted by rooster
He likes to rely on that typical maggie fallback: repeat the lie until everyone accepts it as the truth.
Wanna make a bet he will never supply the evidence/proof of his claims?

Celebrating blowing up cartels? Hell yeah. The important question is why aren’t you.

Evidence? Proof?


Living in a house lacking mirrors, I presume. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Only mirrored house anyone is living in around here are the sheeple adulating the orange blobs image.

Because I respect human rights on a higher level.

We've both made our points multiple times. Give it a rest. You'll have lots more opportunity elsewhere to express your unquestioning fealty to this madness. We'll talk soon.

. Originally Posted by rooster
No joke. Following legal precedent and law, respecting the rights of people go hand in hand with proper interdiction activities.

I ain't no naval guy but I know a person that is well intitmate with maritime law and interdiction activities on the high seas. Both by action and law. And he states that everything operation southern spear are far removed from proper legal actions.
You figure they’re bombing guys out for a pleasure cruise or looking to hook red snapper? That’s ridiculous. It’s not Trump or Hegseth flipping a coin over who gets droned, that’s what satellites and human sources are for. The chance that SIGINT is wrong is minuscule. I’ll go with their assessment over a bunch of whining, blue haired, septum pierced apologists.

And when did peace through strength become outdated? FAFO doctrine has only prevented nuclear innihilation for pushing a century, a pretty good track record. The military is there to kill people and destroy property, war is the only look they’ve got. Peace is for the state department, the armed forces are for when they fail. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Interesting to conflate FAFO with mutual assured destruction...