Oh goody. ANOTHER threAT. Excuse me if i shit myself.
What's the Spider Hole?
So are providers like you willing to give another session if a client is not satisfied like the chef who makes you another dinner or the movie rental place that switches out the scratched disk? Papers that make typo or mistakes publish corrections later. I see no apology or correction here.
As for constructive criticism, how does that remedy tbone's situation? Even though he spent a good amount of money and was left unhappy, he's the one that should give her the benefit of doubt and do something that benefits her? As has been mentioned many times in this thread, those ladies that have an off day or aren't perfect can weather a bad review or two without problems. I don't think this "sadistic" display for our entertainment would be happening if she, as the chef, didn't come back to our table and threw the shitty plate in our faces. If she, as the movie rental place, didn't tell us to fuck off because the disk is scratched, then charged us the purchase price of the movie.
Besides, how do you know there was no constructive criticism given? There was obviously some communication back and forth after the session.
We should lay off and chill? Give constructive criticism? At what point is a bad review warranted? Should we, after a bad session, give constructive criticism, then go back? If we don't go back after the first bad session, then we should just give criticism and shut the fuck up? Seems to me that you're advocating that we just give feedback, lay off and chill, and never write a bad review unless we waste more money and time to see a bad provider at least twice. That really should work in your favor, shouldn't it?
I can understand the young having an outburst. Hell I can even understand the old having an outburst. However, there are outbursts, then there are outbursts. LauraLucks telling us she doesn't want to suck our cocks for money anymore was an outburst. The fact that this is titled "You asked for it" tells me that this is a deliberate outburst calculated to do damage to tbone, and she made the decision to post his personal business in public. This is a bit more than just an outburst, but a breach of confidence.
"Girls like you" like to tell us to not write bad reviews because of the effects those words have on "sweet young ladies". That, in essence, is telling us to ignore the purpose of the board - information exchange. If we followed your advice, there would be no bad reviews, no reports of NCNS, wasting our time, or using deceptive pictures. I know you wouldn't ever stoop to such things, but there have been ladies here who have done those things. Some unscrupulous providers have even gone so far as to try to trash other members, black mail others, manipulate men and women, bait & switch, lie about their age and looks, then they disappear and reappear under new name and persona. If you still think retaliating against a bad review by outing personal business should be given the same leeway as Netflix sending a scratched disk, please go back under the rock you crawled out from. Originally Posted by Rand Al'Thor
Yea, tbone. Back off. This is Karlie's thread...
If she weren't absolutely THRILLED with how it's going, she would have had it closed by now.
This is the best publicity she's received, probably ever.
Well done girl... Originally Posted by Damon Bradley
Dilemma - while intrigued that I am involved in one of the longest and most interesting threads I have seen I really just wanted to let a few guys know I thought the price/service wasn't what I had hoped. Seriously, we all know what we are doing. If I didn't want to risk anything I'd jack off in the shower. If they didn't want a risk they would screw for free. This provider code of ethics cracks me up. They are whores, we are johns. Collateral damage happens. Calm down Austin. Originally Posted by tbone77494