I've read some of the women's responses and will provide a scenario using the their own logic. You ladies tell me how you would feel?
Client sees provider since day one. He sees her once a month on a monthly basis and (by most of you gal's conditions) meets the faithful client requirement for grandfathering when you raise your rates.
Then the provider has a family emergency and must take a hiatus for 4 to 5 months.
Client moves on to another provider and now has his needs fulfilled by another provider.
The first provider returns and requests her loyal client to return to their normal routine. Client then DEMANDS a steeper discount rate then previous because (through no fault of hers) the first provider was unable to meet his needs for several months.
By some of you gal''s logic the client is justified in his demands since the provider was unable to continue the arrangement on a timely basis.
Now tell me how you gals would react? My guess is most of you would tell the client to go pound sand.
Originally Posted by Hercules
I don't think your analogy is on point. If you want to make it comparable, then you'd have to posit that the client has a published rate that he'll pay to see an escort and that during the time that the escort in question was away, he lowered this published rate. If that happened, then I don't think the gal should be too upset if he informs her that he will not pay the prior rate but is willing to see her at his lower rate.
IMO grandfathering is like circumcision. Either go all the way or forget it..
Originally Posted by Hercules
Doesn't make sense to me from the escort's perspective. Wouldn't she want to offer grandfathered rates only to those who provided the most business, were most respectful, were least amount of time and effort, were most enjoyable, were most likely to not see her if she didn't offer reduced rate, etc.? Lots of different factors at play. Thus, one size fits all doesn't make business sense.
Last, I'm kinda confused now. In your original post, I thought you were complaining about the
way in which she informed you that you were not grandfathered. Your latest posts seem to be complaining more about the
fact of not being grandfathered. Is it the first, the second, or both?